Steven Pinker, Sam Harris and the epidemic of annoying white male intellectuals – Salon
Posted: October 25, 2019 at 1:47 am
In a recent article for Current Affairs, Nathan Robinson describes Harvard psychologist Steven Pinker as the most annoying man in the world because Pinker is the type of person who constantly insists hes Just Being Reasonable while he is actually being extremely goddamn unreasonable. Although Robinsons article was a bit harsh in tone, it gestures at something very real: were in the midst of an epidemic of intellectuals, almost entirely white men, who claim to embody Reason and Rationality while flagrantly and habitually succumbing to the same tribalistic tendencies that they identify as the Ultimate Enemy.
My own experience with Pinker and his ilk exemplifies the problem. Last January, I published an article here at Salon that summarized some extremely detailed criticisms that I wrote of Pinker's book "Enlightenment Now!" More specifically, I examined a few pages in the books Existential Threats chapter, one line or passage at a time, since my own research focuses on existential threats (that is, threats to civilization and humanity) and thus I have some knowledge of the topic.
Although Pinker is widely known, or at least was at one point, as a clear-headed, objective intellectual of the highest caliber, his chapter on existential threats was overflowing with quotes taken out of context, misrepresented ideas, false dichotomies, blatantly inaccurate claims, poor reasoning, dubious citations, condescending straw-man attacks and cockamamie ad hominems. If the chapter had been a first-year undergraduate term paper, and if the professor were an exceptionally easy grader who habitually dished out As for poorly researched papers, Pinkers chapter might have received a C.
(The popularity of poor scholarship seems to be on the rise, incidentally. Just consider the egregious mistakes made by Jared Diamond in his most recent book, "Upheaval.")
What was most telling, though, was the response to my article. For example, the founding editor of Skeptic magazine, Michael Shermer, tweeted this in response to my critique:
Where @RichardDawkins had his fleas (The Dawkins Delusion etc.), @sapinker has his cockroaches (the oleaginous Phil Torres desperate for attention), artfully squashed here:
Shermer then linked to a blog post by Jerry Coyne, which contained a response from Pinker. Before getting to that, though, Shermers tweet is notable for a couple of reasons. First, not only does it contain a personal attack, but the personal attack is overtly uncivil. Thats a bit humorous given that Shermer, as well as Pinker, are famous for accusing progressives, especially those who care about women and people of color, of incivility. For example, in May of this year, Pinker tweeted:
Are you concerned about the growing illiberalism, incivility, intellectual conformity, and repression of debate in today's universities? Join us at the meeting of the society set up to encourage viewpoint diversity and constructive debate on campuses. Ill be giving the keynote.
But Pinker did nothing to call out Shermer for his patently crude, puerile behavior, which has also included calling people he disagrees with (seriously) namby-pamby bedwetters and (seriously) losers. This is perhaps unsurprising when one realizes the Pinker has unwaveringly supported Shermer despite multiple women accusing Shermer of sexual harassment, assault and even rape. To my knowledge, Pinker has made no effort to contact any of Shermers purported victims. And why would he? What does truth have to do with standing by your comrades? Instead, Pinker has repeatedly de-emphasized the issue of rape in society and college campuses by tendentiously pointing to opinions that support his preferred views rather than by honestly examining the totality of evidence, which gives a quite different perspective. All of this is very worrisome, tribalistic behavior. But it gets worse.
Back to the blog that Shermer references. The particular post was published by Jerry Coyne, a biologist at the University of Chicago who has become something of Pinkers bulldog, defending him against any and all criticisms no matter what, with (almost) no questions asked. One of the most recent examples is Coyne coming to Pinkers defense after a picture emerged of Pinker with Jeffrey Epstein, the child sex-trafficker who recently killed himself in a New York jail cell.
Coyne quickly dismissed criticisms of Pinker hanging out with Epstein as mere slander and character assassination, writing that suggestions that Pinker should have known better disturbed me so much since Pinker is a friend whose character I respect. The problem is that Pinker appears in the photo with Epstein and he tweeted out an affidavit defending Epstein after Epstein was convicted of sex crimes, which happened in 2008. That is inexcusable and gross but not to Coyne, whose allegiance is rooted not in evidence but loyalty.
So it should be no surprise that Coyne tore into my critique of the existential threats chapter, inaccurately calling it a hit piece. Indeed, by any reasonable account, the article was a substantive critique of shoddy scholarship. In fact, I was in touch with four scholars or writers whose work Pinker misrepresents within just a few pages of the chapter. All of them were unhappy with the quality of Pinkers work, so its not like this was just me being a grump.
For example, the political economist Eric Zency, whom Pinker incorrectly describes as an engineer, was livid that Pinker had used a line from one of his papers to mean the exact opposite of what Zency had intended. In an email to me about Pinkers misuse of his quote, Zency remarked, How this guy managed to become a public intellectual in fields so far removed from his expertise is something to wonder at. I agree.
Pinker also wrote a response to my critique, but it only further justifies the view that Pinker is or has become, sadly an ideologue who cant acknowledge when hes wrong. Just consider that the second sentence of his response makes an ad hominem claim that Im trying to make a career out of warning people about the existential threat that AI [i.e., artificial intelligence] poses to humanity. Since ['Enlightenment Now'] evaluates and dismisses that threat, it poses an existential threat to Phil Torress career.
This is obvious nonsense. First of all, the same thing could be said about Pinker: Since his career these days is based on claiming that things have been going quite well for humanity, convincing people that AI poses an existential threat itself could be seen as an existential threat to Pinkers reputation. How Pinker and Coyne both missed this obvious flaw suggests that they werent wearing their critical-thinking hats. The aim of Pinkers comment was to discredit a critique without having to engage with its substance.
Once again, I contacted four scholars or writers who affirmed errors in a small handful of pages in Pinkers chapter. I have no doubt that if someone were to find the same problems in a chapter written by, say, Reza Aslan or Linda Sarsour, both of whom are loathed by the Pinker-Coyne crew, theyd be hailing the critique as proof that Aslan and Sarsour are intellectual frauds.
Pinker then defended one of his most flagrant mistakes: classifying a computer scientist at UC Berkeley, Stuart Russell, as someone who isnt worried about AI. The exact opposite is true! Pinker then doubled down, insisting that his description of Russell was accurate, even though Russell himself told me in an email, which I quote in my article, that hed seen this [mention in Pinker's book] and I agree its an incorrect characterization. So, you have Pinker on one side refusing to acknowledge that he incorrectly characterized a person who says he has been incorrectly characterized. This led Julia Galef, a notable effective altruist who hosts the Rationally Speaking podcast and has knowledge of the relevant issues, to tweet:
Im frustrated Steven Pinker wont admit an error in Enlightenment Now.Summary:- Pinker names Stuart Russell as an expert whos skeptical of AI risk- Someone points out that's exactly backwards; Russell is one of the main experts warning about AI risk- Pinker doubles down
She concludes that the point is its bad that Pinker got this fact wrong and wont admit it. This encapsulates the central problem: Pinker and his ilk dont acknowledge errors when they make them; they are ideologues rather than truth-seekers, willing to bend the facts, launch personal attacks and censor critics to win debates. At exactly the moment in history when we need true intellectual leadership, people who exemplify intellectual honesty and integrity, the most, we get stubborn tribespeople.
But the problem is hardly confined to those mentioned above: Shermer, Coyne and Pinker. Consider another Intellectual Dark Web (IDW) luminary, Sam Harris, one of the most famous atheists in the world because of his book "The End of Faith." Previously, I never had any reason to believe that Harris was racist but I do now. He has spent a massive amount of time and energy defending Charles Murray, author of "The Bell Curve," which argues that black people are inherently inferior to white people.
Over and over again, ad nauseam, Harris has used his large platform to suggest that Murray isnt a junk scientist peddling cowardly racist memes, but someone whos been victimized by those anti-truth progressives. Even more, Harris apparently believes Murrays claim that blacks are genetically dumber than whites. In a podcast with Josh Zepps, Harris opines the following with a wholly unjustified degree of epistemic confidence:
As bad luck would have it, but as youd absolutely predict on the basis of just sheer biology, different populations of people, different racial groups, different ethnicities, different groups of people who have been historically isolated from one another geographically, test differently in terms of their average on this measure of cognitive function. So if youre gonna give the Japanese and the Ashkenazi Jews, and African Americans, and Hawaiians youre gonna take populations who differ genetically and we know they differed genetically, thats not debatable and you give them IQ tests, it would be a miracle if every single population had the same mean IQ. And African Americans come out about a standard deviation lower than white Americans. A standard deviation for IQ is about 15 points. So, if its normed to the general population, predominantly white population for an average of 100, the average in the African American community has been around 85.
In other words: black people are dumber than white people. Why? Because of genetic evolution, meaning that IQ is in the genes and the genes of white people are, well, just plain better. What a bold stance, especially amid the ongoing rise of white nationalism in the U.S. and Europe!
In all seriousness, the irresponsibility of being a public intellectual with a large following and spouting unsupported claims with the sort of certainty you might expect from someone reciting the second law of thermodynamics is shocking. If Pinker is annoying, as Robinson claims, then Harris is intolerably obnoxious, constantly demeaning people for not being Rational and Reasonable while simultaneously making anintellectual fool of himself with claims like those above.
Other examples could be adduced, but I dont have an extra 20,000 words to spare. The point is that the entire IDW movement is annoying. Its really, really annoying its champions misrepresent positions without their (mostly white male) audience knowing, and then proceed to embarrass the opposition. They embrace unsupported claims when it suits their narrative. They facilely dismiss good critiques as hit jobs and level ad hominem attacks to undercut criticism. And they refuse they will always refuse, its what overconfident white men do to admit making mistakes when theyre obviously wrong. I am annoyed, like Robinson, mostly because I expected so much better from the most popular intellectuals of our time.
Go here to see the original:
Steven Pinker, Sam Harris and the epidemic of annoying white male intellectuals - Salon
- HitXP Science of Genetics behind the Hindu Gotra System ... [Last Updated On: May 4th, 2015] [Originally Added On: May 4th, 2015]
- Size Genetics - Male Enhancement Reviews [Last Updated On: May 4th, 2015] [Originally Added On: May 4th, 2015]
- Male Infertility | Genetic Abnormalities or Male ... [Last Updated On: May 4th, 2015] [Originally Added On: May 4th, 2015]
- Male infertility - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia [Last Updated On: May 4th, 2015] [Originally Added On: May 4th, 2015]
- Androgenic alopecia - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia [Last Updated On: May 7th, 2015] [Originally Added On: May 7th, 2015]
- Difference Between Male and Female BirdsGenetics and ... [Last Updated On: May 7th, 2015] [Originally Added On: May 7th, 2015]
- URNotAlone Profile for Lynda Flores, Genetic Male Straight ... [Last Updated On: May 21st, 2015] [Originally Added On: May 21st, 2015]
- Understanding Genetics [Last Updated On: May 31st, 2015] [Originally Added On: May 31st, 2015]
- Male - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia [Last Updated On: May 31st, 2015] [Originally Added On: May 31st, 2015]
- WHO | Gender and Genetics [Last Updated On: May 31st, 2015] [Originally Added On: May 31st, 2015]
- The Genetics of Male Infertility - The Turek Clinic [Last Updated On: June 13th, 2015] [Originally Added On: June 13th, 2015]
- Male Hair Loss All You Need To Know - The Belgravia Centre [Last Updated On: June 29th, 2015] [Originally Added On: June 29th, 2015]
- Male-pattern hair loss - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia [Last Updated On: August 1st, 2015] [Originally Added On: August 1st, 2015]
- Genetics - biology [Last Updated On: August 2nd, 2015] [Originally Added On: August 2nd, 2015]
- Are People Born Gay? Genetics and Homosexuality [Last Updated On: August 20th, 2015] [Originally Added On: August 20th, 2015]
- Hormone and genetic study in male to female transsexual ... [Last Updated On: September 21st, 2015] [Originally Added On: September 21st, 2015]
- Cloning Myths - Learn Genetics [Last Updated On: September 25th, 2015] [Originally Added On: September 25th, 2015]
- Sensorineural deafness and male infertility - Genetics ... [Last Updated On: October 17th, 2015] [Originally Added On: October 17th, 2015]
- Workable male sterility systems for hybrid rice: Genetics ... [Last Updated On: October 22nd, 2015] [Originally Added On: October 22nd, 2015]
- Proband - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia [Last Updated On: October 26th, 2015] [Originally Added On: October 26th, 2015]
- Y chromosome - Genetics Home Reference [Last Updated On: October 29th, 2015] [Originally Added On: October 29th, 2015]
- Genetics - NHS Choices [Last Updated On: November 1st, 2015] [Originally Added On: November 1st, 2015]
- Genetics / Does the male or female carrier the gene for twins. [Last Updated On: March 13th, 2016] [Originally Added On: March 13th, 2016]
- The Genetics of Balding | Understanding Genetics [Last Updated On: April 25th, 2016] [Originally Added On: April 25th, 2016]
- Male Infertility - Genetics & IVF Institute [Last Updated On: May 21st, 2016] [Originally Added On: May 21st, 2016]
- Scientist Explains the Genetics of Male Pattern Baldness [Last Updated On: June 16th, 2016] [Originally Added On: June 16th, 2016]
- Definitions for Terms in Genetics Problems [Last Updated On: August 24th, 2016] [Originally Added On: August 24th, 2016]
- Genetics of human male infertility. [Last Updated On: August 24th, 2016] [Originally Added On: August 24th, 2016]
- BEHAVIORAL GENETICS: THE SCIENCE OF ... - PubMed Central (PMC) [Last Updated On: September 13th, 2016] [Originally Added On: September 13th, 2016]
- Review of the Status of Aquaculture Genetics [Last Updated On: September 13th, 2016] [Originally Added On: September 13th, 2016]
- Genetics of Skin Cancer (PDQ)Health Professional Version [Last Updated On: September 22nd, 2016] [Originally Added On: September 22nd, 2016]
- Genetics of Prostate Cancer (PDQ)Health Professional ... [Last Updated On: September 22nd, 2016] [Originally Added On: September 22nd, 2016]
- Genetics of Breast and Gynecologic Cancers (PDQ)Health ... [Last Updated On: September 28th, 2016] [Originally Added On: September 28th, 2016]
- Evolution - Wikipedia [Last Updated On: October 27th, 2016] [Originally Added On: October 27th, 2016]
- Human - Wikipedia [Last Updated On: November 12th, 2016] [Originally Added On: November 12th, 2016]
- Genetics - Wikipedia [Last Updated On: November 23rd, 2016] [Originally Added On: November 23rd, 2016]
- Beefalo - Wikipedia [Last Updated On: December 4th, 2016] [Originally Added On: December 4th, 2016]
- Drosophila melanogaster - Wikipedia [Last Updated On: December 26th, 2016] [Originally Added On: December 26th, 2016]
- Breast CancerPatient Version - National Cancer Institute [Last Updated On: January 6th, 2017] [Originally Added On: January 6th, 2017]
- Sex - Wikipedia [Last Updated On: January 24th, 2017] [Originally Added On: January 24th, 2017]
- The 44 Chromosome Man | Understanding Genetics [Last Updated On: February 5th, 2017] [Originally Added On: February 5th, 2017]
- Binary thought suppresses identity - The Daily Evergreen [Last Updated On: February 8th, 2017] [Originally Added On: February 8th, 2017]
- Tortoiseshell cat - Wikipedia [Last Updated On: February 8th, 2017] [Originally Added On: February 8th, 2017]
- Entrepreneurship Is Genetic, And South Africa Is The Ideal Environment For Young Entrepreneurs To Thrive - Huffington Post South Africa (blog) [Last Updated On: February 8th, 2017] [Originally Added On: February 8th, 2017]
- Women in Data Science conference highlights female participation in male-dominated field - Daily Free Press (subscription) [Last Updated On: February 11th, 2017] [Originally Added On: February 11th, 2017]
- Male Contraceptives Have A Messy History And A Bright Future - Yahoo News [Last Updated On: February 11th, 2017] [Originally Added On: February 11th, 2017]
- The impact of RABL2B gene (rs144944885) on human male infertility in patients with oligoasthenoteratozoospermia ... - UroToday [Last Updated On: February 11th, 2017] [Originally Added On: February 11th, 2017]
- More Than 200 Baldness-Linked Genetic Markers Found - Yahoo News [Last Updated On: February 21st, 2017] [Originally Added On: February 21st, 2017]
- Can Your Anxiety Impact How Long You Last In Bed? - Men's Health [Last Updated On: February 21st, 2017] [Originally Added On: February 21st, 2017]
- Genetic data show mainly men migrated from the Pontic steppe to Europe 5000 years ago - Phys.Org [Last Updated On: February 21st, 2017] [Originally Added On: February 21st, 2017]
- Men inherit male pattern baldness from their mum's side of the family ... - Metro [Last Updated On: February 21st, 2017] [Originally Added On: February 21st, 2017]
- Experts Are One Step Closer To Predicting A Man's Risk For Hair Loss - Huffington Post [Last Updated On: February 21st, 2017] [Originally Added On: February 21st, 2017]
- Baldness linked to over 280 genes - BioNews [Last Updated On: February 21st, 2017] [Originally Added On: February 21st, 2017]
- Genetic basis for male baldness identified in large-scale study - Medical News Today [Last Updated On: February 21st, 2017] [Originally Added On: February 21st, 2017]
- Genetic data show mainly men migrated from the Pontic steppe to ... - Science Daily [Last Updated On: February 23rd, 2017] [Originally Added On: February 23rd, 2017]
- Thousands of horsemen may have swept into Bronze Age Europe, transforming the local population - Science Magazine [Last Updated On: February 23rd, 2017] [Originally Added On: February 23rd, 2017]
- Cohen wins Gates grant for her new take on male contraception - Cornell Chronicle [Last Updated On: June 23rd, 2017] [Originally Added On: June 23rd, 2017]
- A Florida higher-ed official said women's genetics may be keeping ... - Washington Post [Last Updated On: June 23rd, 2017] [Originally Added On: June 23rd, 2017]
- Florida higher education official said women may earn less than men because of genetics - New York Daily News [Last Updated On: June 23rd, 2017] [Originally Added On: June 23rd, 2017]
- Twins Separated at Birth Reveal Staggering Influence of ... [Last Updated On: June 23rd, 2017] [Originally Added On: June 23rd, 2017]
- Scientific studies favor male miceand that could hurt a lot of humans - Popular Science [Last Updated On: July 1st, 2017] [Originally Added On: July 1st, 2017]
- So Cal mountain lions' low genetic diversity threatens population - Davis Enterprise [Last Updated On: July 1st, 2017] [Originally Added On: July 1st, 2017]
- Horse Tale: Oriental Stallions Dominate Horse DNA, Gene Study Shows - NBCNews.com [Last Updated On: July 1st, 2017] [Originally Added On: July 1st, 2017]
- sex chromosome | genetics | Britannica.com [Last Updated On: July 1st, 2017] [Originally Added On: July 1st, 2017]
- The problematics of genetics and the Aryan issue - The Hindu [Last Updated On: July 3rd, 2017] [Originally Added On: July 3rd, 2017]
- Scientists arming new weapon against dengue, malaria mosquitoes - The Indian Express [Last Updated On: July 3rd, 2017] [Originally Added On: July 3rd, 2017]
- Fertility and Genetics - Affordable High Quality Fertility ... [Last Updated On: July 5th, 2017] [Originally Added On: July 5th, 2017]
- Aryan Invasion May Have Transformed India's Bronze-Age Population - Live Science [Last Updated On: July 6th, 2017] [Originally Added On: July 6th, 2017]
- How Masculinity Can Be Bad For Men's Health - WUNC [Last Updated On: July 6th, 2017] [Originally Added On: July 6th, 2017]
- Nilgiris pale tiger an 'aberrant genetic mutation' - The Hindu [Last Updated On: July 8th, 2017] [Originally Added On: July 8th, 2017]
- Evolution and war: The 'deep roots' theory of human violence - Genetic Literacy Project [Last Updated On: July 8th, 2017] [Originally Added On: July 8th, 2017]
- Hair loss in men: THIS shower habit could be why you're going bald - Express.co.uk [Last Updated On: July 10th, 2017] [Originally Added On: July 10th, 2017]
- Don't Blame Your Mom's Dad for Male Pattern Baldness - Inverse [Last Updated On: July 13th, 2017] [Originally Added On: July 13th, 2017]
- Falling sperm counts are linked to endocrine-disrupting chemicals - MinnPost [Last Updated On: July 31st, 2017] [Originally Added On: July 31st, 2017]
- Should genetic engineering be used as a tool for conservation? - chinadialogue [Last Updated On: July 31st, 2017] [Originally Added On: July 31st, 2017]
- Trinity Researchers Lead Analysis of Portugal and Spain's Genetic History - The University Times [Last Updated On: July 31st, 2017] [Originally Added On: July 31st, 2017]
- Williams Professor Wins Grants to Study Evolutionary Genetics - iBerkshires.com [Last Updated On: July 31st, 2017] [Originally Added On: July 31st, 2017]
- History News of the Week: The Biblical Canaanites' Modern Descendants - New Historian [Last Updated On: July 31st, 2017] [Originally Added On: July 31st, 2017]
- When the male fruit fly gets a headache - Haaretz [Last Updated On: July 31st, 2017] [Originally Added On: July 31st, 2017]
- Genetics LadyFrontbum [Last Updated On: July 31st, 2017] [Originally Added On: July 31st, 2017]