DALLAS, Texas, October 29, 2019 (LifeSiteNews) LifeSiteNews has obtained a certified copy of the complete ruling in the case of seven-year-old James Younger, whose mother wanted him to undergo a gender transition against his fathers wishes.

Mr. Jeffrey Younger was fighting to prevent his ex-wife Dr. Anne Georgulas from transitioning James into Luna. The custody battle over James and his twin, Jude, garnered national attention after initially being ignored by the mainstream media. LifeSiteNews and The Texan were the only news outlets present for the entire trial.

Judge Kim Cooks ultimately ruled that Dr. Georgulas will not be able to transition the child into a girl without Mr. Youngers consent, and placed a gag order on both parents preventing either of them from talking about the case with media until James and Jude turn 18.

Judge Cooks made it clear she was not happy with the media attention the case received, and Dr. Georgulas lawyers brought up Mr. Youngers speaking to the media. He said he felt the public had a right to know what was going on in the medical field.

Judge Cooks did not uphold the jurys ruling that the current order be modified to provide one of the parents with sole managing conservatorship. She ruled that Mr. Younger and Dr. Georgulas will be joint managing conservators. They will both need to agree on all medical, dental, and psychological/psychiatric care. If a counselor determines it is appropriate, Mr. Younger will be granted 50/50 custody in January or June 2020. Judge Cooks also mandated family counseling for the entire family.

Judge Cooks is the same judge who, in 2017, awarded Dr. Georgulas the exclusive right, after notifying the Father, to consent to psychiatric and psychological treatment of the children and the exclusive right, after notifying the Father, to consent to medical, dental, and surgical treatment involving invasive procedures.

The court also mandated counseling to address specifically outlined issues and issued an injunction against the parents making disparaging remarks regarding the other parent in the presence of the children or in the childrens listening.

Judge Cooks gave the amicus attorney, Mr. Stacy Dunlop, the power to make medical decisions for the boys if Mr. Younger and Dr. Georgulas cannot agree.

If the parents cannot come to an agreement, they will make an appointment with Stacy Dunlop, the Parenting Coordinator, who will resolve the dispute by making a decision on behalf of the parents if they still disagree, the ruling says.

Specifically on medical, psychological, psychiatric, and dental issues, Mr. Dunlop will resolve the dispute by making a decision on behalf of the parents if they still disagree after discussing the disagreement with Stacy Dunlop.

Dr. Georgulas has the exclusive right to the services and earnings of the children, and the exclusive right to receive child support.

The ruling also outlines the courts 68 findings. The court found that there has been no abuse, neglect, or family violence by either parent to the children or from one parent towards the other. The court found, the mother made no request to surgically or chemically transition the childs sex or to chemically castrate the child.

Evidence presented in court indicated Dr. Georgulas had referrals to the GENECIS transgender childrens clinic. Dr. Georgulas also testified that she consulted with the GENECIS clinic about James. Dr. Georgulas expert witnesses testified about the alleged benefits of affirming transgenderism in children, including the use of puberty blockers and cross-sex hormones.

The court found that, the State of Texas has no compelling interest to justify such interference as to entering Orders requiring the Father to affirm Luna and honor her [sic] choices, both inside and outside the home. In other words, Mr. Younger will not be forced to use female pronouns to refer to his son.

One of the court findings highlighted a statement from Dr. Albritton, the custody evaluator, that Dr. Georgulas was over and above affirming. The court also found that the Mother has exceeded the scope of the exclusive rights and duties provided in the prior order.

The ruling also said that the state has not mandated the transition of James directly: No Texas judge or Texas court nor the 255th family court of appeal has ordered the chemical castration, puberty blockers, hormone blockers, or any transgnder reassignment surgery on this child.

Gov. Greg Abbott, Sen. Ted Cruz, and Rep. Dan Crenshaw all of Texas and many conservative leaders weighed in on the case after it went viral.

Sen. Rand Paul, R-KY, tweeted: We dont let kids drink alcohol til 21. People want to move smoking age to 21. But we will allow a 7 year old to have his life and body altered like this? This is child abuse and the state should side with the father who is trying to protect the child.

The certified copy of the ruling can be read HERE.

Follow all LifeSiteNews coverage of the James Younger case here.

Go here to see the original:
Here are the important details of the James Younger verdict (FULL RULING) - Lifesite

Comments are closed.