Future Visioning The Role Of CRISPR Gene Editing: Navigating Law And Ethics To Regenerate Health And Cure Disease – marketscreener.com
Posted: November 27, 2020 at 1:49 pm
"Despite the projected growth in market applications and abundant investment capital, there is a danger that legal and ethical concerns related to genetic research could put the brakes on gene editing technologies and product programs emanating therefrom."
What is Genome Editing?
There are thousands of diseases occurring in humans, animals, and plants caused by aberrant DNA sequences. Traditional small molecule and biologic therapies have only had minimal success in treating many of these diseases because they mitigate symptoms while failing to address the underlying genetic causes. While human understanding of genetic diseases has increased tremendously since the mapping of the human genome in the late 1990s, our ability to treat them effectively has been limited by our historical inability to alter genetic sequences.
The science of gene editing was born in the 1990s, as scientists developed tools such as zinc-finger nucleases (ZFNs) and TALE nucleases (TALENs) to study the genome and attempt to alter sequences that caused disease. While these systems were an essential first step to demonstrate the potential of gene editing, their development was challenging in practice due to the complexity of engineering protein-DNA interactions.
Then, in 2011, Dr. Emmanuelle Charpentier, a French professor of microbiology, genetics, and biochemistry, and Jennifer Doudna, an American professor of biochemistry, pioneered a revolutionary new gene-editing technology called CRISPR/Cas9. Clustered Regularly Interspaced Short Palindromic Repeats (CRISPR) and Cas9 stands for CRISPR-associated protein 9. In 2020, the revolutionary work of Drs. Charpentier and Doudna developing CRISPR/Cas9 were recognized with the Nobel Prize for Chemistry. The technology was also the source of a long-running and high-profile patent battle between two groups of scientsists.
CRISPR/Cas9 for gene editing came about from a naturally occurring viral defense mechanism in bacteria. The system is cheaper and easier to use than previous technologies. It delivers the Cas9 nuclease complexed with a synthetic guide RNA (gRNA) into a cell, cutting the 'cell's genome at the desired location, allowing existing genes to be removed and new ones added to a living organism's genome. The technique is essential in biotechnology and medicine as it provides for the genomes to be edited in vivo with extremely high precision, efficiently, and with comparative ease. It can create new drugs, agricultural products, and genetically modified organisms or control pathogens and pests. More possibilities include the treatment of inherited genetic diseases and diseases arising from somatic mutations such as cancer. However, its use in human germline genetic modification is highly controversial.
The following diagram from CRISPR Therapeutics AG, a Swiss company, illustrates how it functions:
Market Applications
In the 1990s, nanotechnology and gene editing were necessary plot points for science fiction films. In 2020, developments like nano-sensors and CRISPR gene editing technology have moved these technologies directly into the mainstream, opening a new frontier of novel market applications. According to The Business Research Company, the global CRISPR technology market reached a value of nearly $700 million in 2019, is expected to more than double in 2020, and reach $6.7 billion by 2030. Market applications target all forms of life, from animals to plants to humans.
Gene editing's primary market applications are for the treatment of genetically-defined diseases. CRISPR/Cas9 gene editing promises to enable the engineering of genomes of cell-based therapies and make them safer and available to a broader group of patients. Cell therapies have already begun to make a meaningful impact on specific diseases, and gene editing helps to accelerate that progress across diverse disease areas, including oncology and diabetes.
In the area of human therapy, millions of people worldwide suffer from genetic conditions. Gene-editing technologies like CRISPR-Cas9 have introduced a way to address the cause of debilitating illnesses like cystic fibrosis and create better interventions and therapies. They also have promising market applications for agriculture, food safety, supply, and distribution. For example, grocery retailers are even looking at how gene editing could impact the products they sell. Scientists have created gene-edited crops like non-browning mushrooms and mildew-resistant grapes - experiments that are part of an effort to prevent spoilage, which could ultimately change the way food is sold.
Investment Capital
Despite the inability to travel and conduct face-to-face meetings, attend industry conferences or conduct business other than remotely or with social distance, the investment markets for venture, growth, and private equity capital, as well as corporate R&D budgets, have remained buoyant through 2020 to date. Indeed, the third quarter of 2020 was the second strongest quarter ever for VC-backed companies, with 88 companies raising rounds worth $100 million or more according to the latest PwC/Moneytree report. Healthcare startups raised over $8 billion in the quarter in the United States alone. Gene-editing company Mammouth Biosciences raised a $45 million round of Series B capital in the second quarter of 2020. CRISPR Therapeutics AG raised more in the public markets in primary and secondary capital.
Bayer, Humboldt Fund and Leaps are co-leading a $65 million Series A round for Metagenomi, a biotech startup launched by UC Berkeley scientists. Metagenomi, which will be run by Berkeley's Brian Thomas, is developing a toolbox of CRISPR- and non-CRISPR-based gene-editing systems beyond the Cas9 protein. The goal is to apply machine learning to search through the genomes of these microorganisms, finding new nucleases that can be used in gene therapies. Other investors in the Series A include Sozo Ventures, Agent Capital, InCube Ventures and HOF Capital. Given the focus on new therapies and vaccines to treat the novel coronavirus, we expect continued wind in the sails for gene-editing companies, particularly those with strong product portfolios that leverage the technology.
Legal and Ethical Considerations
Despite the projected growth in market applications and abundant investment capital, there is a danger that legal and ethical concerns related to genetic research could put the brakes on gene-editing technologies and product programs emanating therefrom. The possibility of off-target effects, lack of informed consent for germline therapy, and other ethical concerns could cause government regulators to put a stop on important research and development required to cure disease and regenerate human health.
Gene-editing companies can only make money by developing products that involve editing the human genome. The clinical and commercial success of these product candidates depends on public acceptance of gene-editing therapies for the treatment of human diseases. Public attitudes could be influenced by claims that gene editing is unsafe, unethical, or immoral. Consequently, products created through gene editing may not gain the acceptance of the government, the public, or the medical community. Adverse public reaction to gene therapy, in general, could result in greater government regulation and stricter labeling requirements of gene-editing products. Stakeholders in government, third-party payors, the medical community, and private industry must work to create standards that are both safe and comply with prevailing ethical norms.
The most significant danger to growth in gene-editing technologies lies in ethical concerns about their application to human embryos or the human germline. In 2016, a group of scientists edited the genome of human embryos to modify the gene for hemoglobin beta, the gene in which a mutation occurs in patients with the inherited blood disorder beta thalassemia. Although conducted in non-viable embryos, it shocked the public that scientists could be experimenting with human eggs, sperm, and embryos to alter human life at creation. Then, in 2018, a biophysics researcher in China created the first human genetically edited babies, twin girls, causing public outcry (and triggering government sanctioning of the researcher). In response, the World Health Organization established a committee to advise on the creation of standards for gene editing oversight and governance standards on a global basis.
Some influential non-governmental agencies have called for a moratorium on gene editing, particularly as applied to altering the creation or editing of human life. Other have set forth guidelines on how to use gene-editing technologies in therapeutic applications. In the United States, the National Institute of Health has stated that it will not fund gene-editing studies in human embryos. A U.S. statute called "The Dickey-Wicker Amendment" prohibits the use of federal funds for research projects that would create or destroy human life. Laws in the United Kingdom prohibit genetically modified embryos from being implanted into women. Still, embryos can be altered in research labs under license from the Human Fertilisation and Embryology Authority.
Regulations must keep pace with the change that CRISPR-Cas9 has brought to research labs worldwide. Developing international guidelines could be a step towards establishing cohesive national frameworks. The U.S. National Academy of Sciences recommended seven principles for the governance of human genome editing, including promoting well-being, transparency, due care, responsible science, respect for persons, fairness, and transnational co-operation. In the United Kingdom, a non-governmental organization formed in 1991 called The Nuffield Council has proposed two principles for the ethical acceptability of genome editing in the context of reproduction. First, the intervention intends to secure the welfare of the individual born due to such technology. Second, social justice and solidarity principles are upheld, and the intervention should not result in an intensifying of social divides or marginalizing of disadvantaged groups in society. In 2016, in application of the same, the Crick Institute in London was approved to use CRISPR-Cas9 in human embryos to study early development. In response to a cacophony of conflicting national frameworks, the International Summit on Human Gene Editing was formed in 2015 by NGOs in the United States, the United Kingdom and China, and is working to harmonize regulations global from both the ethical and safety perspectives. As CRISPR co-inventor Jennifer Doudna has written in a now infamous editorial in SCIENCE, "stakeholders must engage in thoughtfully crafting regulations of the technology without stifling it."
Where Do We Go from Here?
The COVID-19 pandemic has forced us to rely more on new technologies to keep us healthy, adapt to working from home, and more. The pandemic makes us more reliant on innovative digital, biological, and physical solutions. It has created a united sense of urgency among the public and private industry (together with government and academia) to be more creative about using technology to regenerate health. With continued advances in computing power, network architecture, communications bandwidths, artificial intelligence, machine learning, and gene editing, society will undoubtedly find more cures for debilitating disease and succeed in regenerating human health. As science advances, it inevitably intersects with legal and ethical norms, both for individuals and civil society, and there are new externalities to consider. Legal and ethical norms will adapt, rebalancing the interests of each. The fourth industrial revolution is accelerating, and hopefully towards curing disease.
Originally published by IPWatchdog.com, November 24, 2020.
The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.
Mr Louis LehotL2 Counsel407 California Avenue, Suite #2Palo AltoCaliforniaUNITED STATESTel: 6507967280E-mail: louis.lehot@L2counsel.comURL: http://www.l2counsel.com/
Mondaq Ltd, 2020 - Tel. +44 (0)20 8544 8300 - http://www.mondaq.com, source Business Briefing
Read this article:
Future Visioning The Role Of CRISPR Gene Editing: Navigating Law And Ethics To Regenerate Health And Cure Disease - marketscreener.com
- This Pitt program is leveling up the gene therapy workforce in Pittsburgh - University of Pittsburgh - March 12th, 2024
- Opinion | Banning Gain-of-Function Research Would Do Far More Harm Than Good - Medpage Today - March 12th, 2024
- The Biggest Challenges Facing Broader Adoption of Novel Cell and Gene Therapies - Pharmaceutical Executive - March 12th, 2024
- Research and development areas of focus - Bristol Myers Squibb - March 4th, 2024
- Overcoming the challenges of gene therapy - Drug Discovery News - March 4th, 2024
- Breakthrough Gene Therapy for LHON: Vision Restoration in Focus at Medical Conference - BNN Breaking - March 4th, 2024
- Revolutionizing Healthcare: Global Gene Therapy Market Surges to US$ 3.44 Billion by 2022 As Revealed In Ne... - WhaTech - March 4th, 2024
- Looking to the future of clinical trials: Gene therapy, precision medicine, and the ongoing quest for rare disease solutions - pharmaphorum - March 4th, 2024
- Complement system response to AAV vector gene therapy - EurekAlert - February 23rd, 2024
- 10 gene therapy companies you should know about - Labiotech.eu - February 23rd, 2024
- Fetal surgery expert Tippi MacKenzie shifts to in-utero gene therapy - STAT - February 23rd, 2024
- Rejuvenate Bio Announces Gene Therapy-Mediated Partial Reprogramming Extends Lifespan and Reverses Age ... - Business Wire - February 23rd, 2024
- Combatting HIV using gene therapy - Drug Target Review - February 23rd, 2024
- Expanding the Horizons of Cell and Gene Therapy - RegMedNet - February 23rd, 2024
- Global Advanced Therapy Medicinal Products CDMO Market Analysis Report 2024-2030: : Increasing Investment and ... - Yahoo Finance UK - February 23rd, 2024
- 2023 gene therapy research STAR Grant winners announced - Pacific Biosciences - February 13th, 2024
- Lifetime Cost of DEB Gene Therapy Could Be $15-$22 Million - Medscape - February 13th, 2024
- 5 Things Youll Learn in Frederick Community Colleges New Cell and Gene Therapy Essentials Certificate ... - BioBuzz - February 13th, 2024
- Regenxbios investigational gene therapy shows promise in Hunter syndrome - PMLiVE - February 13th, 2024
- Topical Gene Therapy Effective in Treating Debilitating Eye Condition - InventUM - University of Miami - February 13th, 2024
- Bayer Says First Patient Randomized In Askbio Phase II Gene Therapy Trial - XM - February 13th, 2024
- Top 3 grants in regenerative medicine: January 2024 - RegMedNet - February 13th, 2024
- Realistic Expectations, Limitations With Gene Therapy for Parkinson Disease: Ignacio Mata, PhD - Neurology Live - February 5th, 2024
- Gene-Based Therapy May Slow Development of Life-Threatening Heart Condition - NYU Langone Health - February 5th, 2024
- After Promising Early Efficacy, Eli Lilly Eager to Study Hearing Loss Gene Therapy in More Children - precisionmedicineonline.com - February 5th, 2024
- Gene therapy hailed as medical magic wand for hereditary swelling disorder - The Guardian - February 5th, 2024
- France Approves Gene Therapy Clinical Trial to Treat Hearing Loss in Children - The Hearing Review - February 5th, 2024
- Early Trial Success for Inherited Deafness Gene-Therapy - RegMedNet - February 5th, 2024
- Can gene therapy be the key to restoring hearing loss? - Labiotech.eu - February 5th, 2024
- Jaguar Gene Therapy Announces FDA Clearance of IND to Study JAG201 in a Genetic Form of Autism Spectrum ... - Business Wire - February 5th, 2024
- FDA inspection clears Abeona's gene therapy BLA By Investing.com - Investing.com - February 5th, 2024
- Hearing Restored in Deaf Children in Gene Therapy Clinical Trial - Securities.io - February 5th, 2024
- Experimental gene therapy allows kids with inherited deafness to hear - The Associated Press - January 28th, 2024
- Children with genetic deafness have hearing restored with gene therapy: Study - ABC News - January 28th, 2024
- Positive Phase 1/2 Clinical Trial Data for an Investigational Gene Therapy for Genetic Hearing Loss to be Presented at ... - Investors | Eli Lilly and... - January 28th, 2024
- UChicago Medicine among the first in the country to offer newly approved sickle cell gene therapies - UChicago Medicine - January 28th, 2024
- Gene Therapy Allows an 11-Year-Old Boy to Hear for the First Time - The New York Times - January 28th, 2024
- Gene therapy restores hearing in children with hereditary deafness - EurekAlert - January 28th, 2024
- Experimental gene therapy helps treat kids with inherited hearing loss - CBS News - January 28th, 2024
- Children's Hospital of Philadelphia Performs First in U.S. Gene Therapy Procedure to Treat Genetic Hearing Loss - PR Newswire - January 28th, 2024
- Gene Therapy Brings Hearing to Kids With Congenital Deafness - U.S. News & World Report - January 28th, 2024
- Gene Therapy Restores Hearing in Small Trial for Kids With Hereditary Deafness - Technology Networks - January 28th, 2024
- Cell Therapies on Ice: Seven Trends in Cryopreservation To Enable Cell and Gene Therapy Research - Technology Networks - January 28th, 2024
- Gene Therapy Brings Hearing to Kids With Congenital Deafness - HealthDay - January 28th, 2024
- Gene therapies restore hearing in several kids with inherited deafness - Livescience.com - January 28th, 2024
- 11-Year-Old Boy Hears For First Time Ever Thanks To Gene Therapy Breakthrough - IFLScience - January 28th, 2024
- Innovative Gene Therapy Restores Hearing In Deaf Child, Offering Potential Cure - Study Finds - January 28th, 2024
- Sound of Success, Gene Therapy Breakthrough Grants Hearing to Deaf Children in China-Harvard Study - Hoodline - January 28th, 2024
- Perspectives in FTD Research Webinar: Gene Therapy for FTD -- What Do I Need to Know? | AFTD - AFTD - January 20th, 2024
- UK leads the way in cell and gene therapy - Research Professional News - January 20th, 2024
- Charles River's (CRL) New Launch to Boost Gene Therapy Programs - Yahoo Finance - January 20th, 2024
- UK maintains status as an attractive destination for advanced therapy clinical trials - BioPharma-Reporter.com - January 20th, 2024
- Understanding the impact of AI on the advancement of gene therapy development - pharmaphorum - January 20th, 2024
- Gene therapy TSHA-102 delivered to 1st child in REVEAL trial - Rett Syndrome News - January 20th, 2024
- AAV Vectors in Gene Therapy Market is Predicted to Observe Skyrocketed Growth During the Study Period (2019-2032 ... - PR Newswire - January 20th, 2024
- Family pins hopes on gene therapy - The Recorder and Times - January 20th, 2024
- Arbor, 4DMT partner on new gene therapies in ALS, other diseases - ALS News Today - January 11th, 2024
- The year of gene therapy? FDA's Marks calls for solutions to regulatory, manufacturing challenges - BioWorld Online - January 11th, 2024
- Gene Therapy Approvals Expected to Ramp Up in 2024 Amid Manufacturing, Cost Challenges - BioSpace - January 11th, 2024
- Turning On Gene Therapy with the pA Regulator - RegMedNet - January 11th, 2024
- Revolutionizing Healthcare: Gene Therapy Market Projected to Reach USD 46.5 billion by 2030 at a 22. - PharmiWeb.com - January 11th, 2024
- Regeneron CEO Reveals the Game-Changing Potential of Gene Therapy in Biotech! - BioTecNika - January 11th, 2024
- Bayer's AskBio checks off another early win for gene therapy platform with Parkinson's safety data - FierceBiotech - January 11th, 2024
- Are Rare Brain Diseases the Next Commercial Frontier for Gene Therapy? - MedCity News - January 3rd, 2024
- Novartis, Voyager Ink Up-to-$1.3B Expansion of Neuro Gene Therapy Collaboration - Genetic Engineering & Biotechnology News - January 3rd, 2024
- Novel switch turns genes on/off on cue, a promising step toward safer gene therapy - Phys.org - January 3rd, 2024
- Which Therapeutic Areas Experts Think Will Gain Traction In 2024 - Clinical Leader - January 3rd, 2024
- Voyager Therapeutics and Novartis Announce Major Licensing Deal in Gene Therapy Field - Medriva - January 3rd, 2024
- We Are About to Enter the Golden Age of Gene Therapy - Inverse - January 3rd, 2024
- Revolutionizing Gene Therapy: Baylor Researchers Develop RNA-Based Switch for Therapeutic Protein Control - BNN Breaking - January 3rd, 2024
- Casgevy and Lyfgenia: Two Gene Therapies Approved for Sickle Cell Disease - Yale Medicine - December 25th, 2023
- Top story: Family connects with researchers behind Canavan gene therapy - UMass Medical School - December 25th, 2023
- Excision Bio Seeks to Suppress HIV Replication With CRISPR Gene Therapy - AJMC.com Managed Markets Network - December 25th, 2023
- Hemgenix Gene Therapy Shows Long-Term Efficacy, Safety in Hemophilia B Patients - Managed Healthcare Executive - December 25th, 2023
- The missing piece of the puzzle - EUobserver - December 25th, 2023
- Brace yourselves for these trends in clinical research in 2024 - Labiotech.eu - December 25th, 2023
- RegMedNet's 2023 remix: top content of the year - RegMedNet - December 25th, 2023
- BU Researchers Helped Develop the First FDA-Approved Gene Therapies to Treat Sickle Cell Disease - Boston University - December 16th, 2023
- Research discovers that mice possess a natural gene therapy system - Phys.org - December 16th, 2023
- Cell- and gene-therapy hub bound for Lake Success; New York to invest up to $150 million - Newsday - December 16th, 2023