Americans want a say in human genome editing, survey shows – Los Angeles Times
Posted: August 11, 2017 at 2:41 pm
When it comes to CRISPR, our society has some important decisions to make.
Just last week, scientists reported a new first in the journal Nature: They edited heritable cells in human embryos to treat an inherited form of heart disease. The day after the research was published, a group of genetics experts published a statement calling for further debate before applications of the technology are taken any further in humans.
According to a new survey of 1,600 adults published in the journal Science today, much of the American public shares this desire for engagement in decision-making. Led by Dietram Scheufele, a professor of science communication at the University of Wisconsin - Madison, the study found that while support for gene editing applications varies, a majority of respondents think the public should be consulted before genome editing is used in humans.
Gene editing presents the potential for remarkable benefits.
The potential to cure genetic disease and to ensure the safety of the world's food supply in the face of climate change are perhaps the most exciting opportunities, said Jennifer Doudna, a chemist at UC Berkeley who was an early pioneer of the powerful gene-editing technique CRISPR-Cas9 and was not involved in the new study.
But it also raises some serious ethical questions, especially when we turn our attention to tweaking the human genome, Scheufele said. Many people find some applications like disease treatment valuable, and others like making your children more intelligent morally shaky.
For example, scientists may eventually develop a cure for what some people dont consider an illness like a disability, Scheufele said. Would those who chose not to undergo genetic therapy or who couldnt afford it then be discriminated against even more as a result?
These and other ethical concerns go beyond the bounds of science, Scheufele says, and his poll results show that the public wants to be involved in the debate.
Oregon Health & Science University
Embryos develop into blastocysts after co-injection, which could someday be used in fertility clinics to help people trying to have children free of genetic disease.
Embryos develop into blastocysts after co-injection, which could someday be used in fertility clinics to help people trying to have children free of genetic disease. (Oregon Health & Science University)
Because of the fast-moving progress of gene editing research and the vast potential for both beneficial applications and negative consequences, many experts have called for public engagement on the issue including in a consensus report released this year by the National Academy of Sciences (NAS) and the National Academy of Medicine (NAM).
The new study strove to answer some questions emerging from the National Academies report. First, how do people feel about different applications of gene editing? And secondly, do Americans agree that the public should be consulted on gene editing applications? Similar questions had been asked in previous polls, but the authors wanted to get some more specific data.
Human genome editing can be used for two broad purposes: therapy or enhancement. Therapeutic applications include the treatment of genetic disorders like muscular dystrophy or sickle cell disease, while enhancement might be used to change your daughters eye color or make her grow taller.
Each of these changes can be heritable or not, depending on which type of cell is tweaked. Somatic cells are nonreproductive, so any changes to these cells will not be passed on to future generations. Germline cells, on the other hand, are heritable therefore, any modifications will be inherited by the treated persons children and grandchildren.
Reprinted with permission from D.A. Scheufele et al., Science 357:6351 2017
A graphic from the paper showing the acceptance of gene editing by application.
A graphic from the paper showing the acceptance of gene editing by application. (Reprinted with permission from D.A. Scheufele et al., Science 357:6351 2017)
The new poll shows that two-thirds of Americans support therapeutic applications, whether to somatic (64% support) or germline (65% support) cells. When it comes to enhancement, however, there is much less approval. Only 39% of respondents find somatic enhancement acceptable, with 35% saying it is unacceptable. Levels of support dropped even lower for heritable germline enhancement, to 26% in acceptance and 51% in opposition.
When these results were broken down by how religious respondents were, some variation emerged. Religious people are less supportive of genome editing overall. Only half of them expressed some support of treatment applications, compared with 75% of nonreligious respondents. When it comes to enhancement, 28% of religious respondents and 45% of nonreligious people reported some level of support.
The authors also ranked respondents in terms of low, medium and high knowledge by their score on a nine-question factual quiz. Those in the high-knowledge category were far more supportive of treatment applications, with 76% in support compared with only 32% of low-knowledge respondents.
When asked about enhancement applications, the high-knowledge group was very polarized, with 41% in support and a nearly equal amount in opposition. In contrast, half of low-knowledge people reported that they neither support nor oppose gene editing.
Robert Blendon, who studies health policy at the Harvard School of Public Health, said that the polarization could be there for a reason. Those who know more about the technology have probably learned about it because they have a vested interest maybe a genetic disease runs in their family or they are concerned with ethical consequences.
Reprinted with permission from D.A. Scheufele et al., Science 357:6351 2017
A graphic from the paper showing the opinions of respondents based on religiosity and knowledge.
A graphic from the paper showing the opinions of respondents based on religiosity and knowledge. (Reprinted with permission from D.A. Scheufele et al., Science 357:6351 2017)
The more religious people were, the less likely they were to trust the scientific community to responsibly develop new technologies. This trend was opposite when it came to knowledge: The more knowledgeable people were about the technology, the more likely they were to trust the scientists.
While the two groups may have very different reasons, both highly religious and highly knowledgeable people agreed that the public should be involved in decision-making before gene editing is used in humans.
Blendon said that while its clear the public wants a say in how gene editing is used, its unclear exactly what public engagement looks like. The first way most people might think of being consulted is through their elected officials, but other surveys suggest that the public actually doesnt think the government should be making decisions about genome technology.
Scheufele said that there is currently no infrastructure in place for crucial two-way communication between scientists and the public on the genome editing issue but its important to develop it.
Diverse groups and perspectives have an important role to play in shaping the early stages of human genome editing research, Scheufele said. Scientists may not think to investigate all the questions that the public may deem vital.
If we ask the wrong questions, he said, then we may have perfect technical answers to all the wrong questions.
@mirakatherine
See the original post here:
Americans want a say in human genome editing, survey shows - Los Angeles Times
- This Pitt program is leveling up the gene therapy workforce in Pittsburgh - University of Pittsburgh - March 12th, 2024
- Opinion | Banning Gain-of-Function Research Would Do Far More Harm Than Good - Medpage Today - March 12th, 2024
- The Biggest Challenges Facing Broader Adoption of Novel Cell and Gene Therapies - Pharmaceutical Executive - March 12th, 2024
- Research and development areas of focus - Bristol Myers Squibb - March 4th, 2024
- Overcoming the challenges of gene therapy - Drug Discovery News - March 4th, 2024
- Breakthrough Gene Therapy for LHON: Vision Restoration in Focus at Medical Conference - BNN Breaking - March 4th, 2024
- Revolutionizing Healthcare: Global Gene Therapy Market Surges to US$ 3.44 Billion by 2022 As Revealed In Ne... - WhaTech - March 4th, 2024
- Looking to the future of clinical trials: Gene therapy, precision medicine, and the ongoing quest for rare disease solutions - pharmaphorum - March 4th, 2024
- Complement system response to AAV vector gene therapy - EurekAlert - February 23rd, 2024
- 10 gene therapy companies you should know about - Labiotech.eu - February 23rd, 2024
- Fetal surgery expert Tippi MacKenzie shifts to in-utero gene therapy - STAT - February 23rd, 2024
- Rejuvenate Bio Announces Gene Therapy-Mediated Partial Reprogramming Extends Lifespan and Reverses Age ... - Business Wire - February 23rd, 2024
- Combatting HIV using gene therapy - Drug Target Review - February 23rd, 2024
- Expanding the Horizons of Cell and Gene Therapy - RegMedNet - February 23rd, 2024
- Global Advanced Therapy Medicinal Products CDMO Market Analysis Report 2024-2030: : Increasing Investment and ... - Yahoo Finance UK - February 23rd, 2024
- 2023 gene therapy research STAR Grant winners announced - Pacific Biosciences - February 13th, 2024
- Lifetime Cost of DEB Gene Therapy Could Be $15-$22 Million - Medscape - February 13th, 2024
- 5 Things Youll Learn in Frederick Community Colleges New Cell and Gene Therapy Essentials Certificate ... - BioBuzz - February 13th, 2024
- Regenxbios investigational gene therapy shows promise in Hunter syndrome - PMLiVE - February 13th, 2024
- Topical Gene Therapy Effective in Treating Debilitating Eye Condition - InventUM - University of Miami - February 13th, 2024
- Bayer Says First Patient Randomized In Askbio Phase II Gene Therapy Trial - XM - February 13th, 2024
- Top 3 grants in regenerative medicine: January 2024 - RegMedNet - February 13th, 2024
- Realistic Expectations, Limitations With Gene Therapy for Parkinson Disease: Ignacio Mata, PhD - Neurology Live - February 5th, 2024
- Gene-Based Therapy May Slow Development of Life-Threatening Heart Condition - NYU Langone Health - February 5th, 2024
- After Promising Early Efficacy, Eli Lilly Eager to Study Hearing Loss Gene Therapy in More Children - precisionmedicineonline.com - February 5th, 2024
- Gene therapy hailed as medical magic wand for hereditary swelling disorder - The Guardian - February 5th, 2024
- France Approves Gene Therapy Clinical Trial to Treat Hearing Loss in Children - The Hearing Review - February 5th, 2024
- Early Trial Success for Inherited Deafness Gene-Therapy - RegMedNet - February 5th, 2024
- Can gene therapy be the key to restoring hearing loss? - Labiotech.eu - February 5th, 2024
- Jaguar Gene Therapy Announces FDA Clearance of IND to Study JAG201 in a Genetic Form of Autism Spectrum ... - Business Wire - February 5th, 2024
- FDA inspection clears Abeona's gene therapy BLA By Investing.com - Investing.com - February 5th, 2024
- Hearing Restored in Deaf Children in Gene Therapy Clinical Trial - Securities.io - February 5th, 2024
- Experimental gene therapy allows kids with inherited deafness to hear - The Associated Press - January 28th, 2024
- Children with genetic deafness have hearing restored with gene therapy: Study - ABC News - January 28th, 2024
- Positive Phase 1/2 Clinical Trial Data for an Investigational Gene Therapy for Genetic Hearing Loss to be Presented at ... - Investors | Eli Lilly and... - January 28th, 2024
- UChicago Medicine among the first in the country to offer newly approved sickle cell gene therapies - UChicago Medicine - January 28th, 2024
- Gene Therapy Allows an 11-Year-Old Boy to Hear for the First Time - The New York Times - January 28th, 2024
- Gene therapy restores hearing in children with hereditary deafness - EurekAlert - January 28th, 2024
- Experimental gene therapy helps treat kids with inherited hearing loss - CBS News - January 28th, 2024
- Children's Hospital of Philadelphia Performs First in U.S. Gene Therapy Procedure to Treat Genetic Hearing Loss - PR Newswire - January 28th, 2024
- Gene Therapy Brings Hearing to Kids With Congenital Deafness - U.S. News & World Report - January 28th, 2024
- Gene Therapy Restores Hearing in Small Trial for Kids With Hereditary Deafness - Technology Networks - January 28th, 2024
- Cell Therapies on Ice: Seven Trends in Cryopreservation To Enable Cell and Gene Therapy Research - Technology Networks - January 28th, 2024
- Gene Therapy Brings Hearing to Kids With Congenital Deafness - HealthDay - January 28th, 2024
- Gene therapies restore hearing in several kids with inherited deafness - Livescience.com - January 28th, 2024
- 11-Year-Old Boy Hears For First Time Ever Thanks To Gene Therapy Breakthrough - IFLScience - January 28th, 2024
- Innovative Gene Therapy Restores Hearing In Deaf Child, Offering Potential Cure - Study Finds - January 28th, 2024
- Sound of Success, Gene Therapy Breakthrough Grants Hearing to Deaf Children in China-Harvard Study - Hoodline - January 28th, 2024
- Perspectives in FTD Research Webinar: Gene Therapy for FTD -- What Do I Need to Know? | AFTD - AFTD - January 20th, 2024
- UK leads the way in cell and gene therapy - Research Professional News - January 20th, 2024
- Charles River's (CRL) New Launch to Boost Gene Therapy Programs - Yahoo Finance - January 20th, 2024
- UK maintains status as an attractive destination for advanced therapy clinical trials - BioPharma-Reporter.com - January 20th, 2024
- Understanding the impact of AI on the advancement of gene therapy development - pharmaphorum - January 20th, 2024
- Gene therapy TSHA-102 delivered to 1st child in REVEAL trial - Rett Syndrome News - January 20th, 2024
- AAV Vectors in Gene Therapy Market is Predicted to Observe Skyrocketed Growth During the Study Period (2019-2032 ... - PR Newswire - January 20th, 2024
- Family pins hopes on gene therapy - The Recorder and Times - January 20th, 2024
- Arbor, 4DMT partner on new gene therapies in ALS, other diseases - ALS News Today - January 11th, 2024
- The year of gene therapy? FDA's Marks calls for solutions to regulatory, manufacturing challenges - BioWorld Online - January 11th, 2024
- Gene Therapy Approvals Expected to Ramp Up in 2024 Amid Manufacturing, Cost Challenges - BioSpace - January 11th, 2024
- Turning On Gene Therapy with the pA Regulator - RegMedNet - January 11th, 2024
- Revolutionizing Healthcare: Gene Therapy Market Projected to Reach USD 46.5 billion by 2030 at a 22. - PharmiWeb.com - January 11th, 2024
- Regeneron CEO Reveals the Game-Changing Potential of Gene Therapy in Biotech! - BioTecNika - January 11th, 2024
- Bayer's AskBio checks off another early win for gene therapy platform with Parkinson's safety data - FierceBiotech - January 11th, 2024
- Are Rare Brain Diseases the Next Commercial Frontier for Gene Therapy? - MedCity News - January 3rd, 2024
- Novartis, Voyager Ink Up-to-$1.3B Expansion of Neuro Gene Therapy Collaboration - Genetic Engineering & Biotechnology News - January 3rd, 2024
- Novel switch turns genes on/off on cue, a promising step toward safer gene therapy - Phys.org - January 3rd, 2024
- Which Therapeutic Areas Experts Think Will Gain Traction In 2024 - Clinical Leader - January 3rd, 2024
- Voyager Therapeutics and Novartis Announce Major Licensing Deal in Gene Therapy Field - Medriva - January 3rd, 2024
- We Are About to Enter the Golden Age of Gene Therapy - Inverse - January 3rd, 2024
- Revolutionizing Gene Therapy: Baylor Researchers Develop RNA-Based Switch for Therapeutic Protein Control - BNN Breaking - January 3rd, 2024
- Casgevy and Lyfgenia: Two Gene Therapies Approved for Sickle Cell Disease - Yale Medicine - December 25th, 2023
- Top story: Family connects with researchers behind Canavan gene therapy - UMass Medical School - December 25th, 2023
- Excision Bio Seeks to Suppress HIV Replication With CRISPR Gene Therapy - AJMC.com Managed Markets Network - December 25th, 2023
- Hemgenix Gene Therapy Shows Long-Term Efficacy, Safety in Hemophilia B Patients - Managed Healthcare Executive - December 25th, 2023
- The missing piece of the puzzle - EUobserver - December 25th, 2023
- Brace yourselves for these trends in clinical research in 2024 - Labiotech.eu - December 25th, 2023
- RegMedNet's 2023 remix: top content of the year - RegMedNet - December 25th, 2023
- BU Researchers Helped Develop the First FDA-Approved Gene Therapies to Treat Sickle Cell Disease - Boston University - December 16th, 2023
- Research discovers that mice possess a natural gene therapy system - Phys.org - December 16th, 2023
- Cell- and gene-therapy hub bound for Lake Success; New York to invest up to $150 million - Newsday - December 16th, 2023