Posts Tagged ‘report’

Cell Therapy Technologies market is projected to grow at a CAGR of 10.7% by 2034: Visiongain – GlobeNewswire

Visiongain has published a new report entitled Cell Therapy Technologies Market Report 2024-2034: Forecasts by Product (Sera, Media, Reagent, Cell Engineering Product, Cell Culture Vessels, Equipment, Systems and Software, Others), by Cell Type (T-Cells, Stem Cells, Other Cells), by Process (Cell Processing, Cell Preservation, Distribution, and Handling, Process Monitoring and Quality Control), by End-users (Biopharmaceutical & Biotechnology Companies, CROs, Research Institutes and Cell Banks) AND Regional and Leading National Market Analysis PLUS Analysis of Leading Companies AND COVID-19 Impact and Recovery Pattern Analysis.

The cell therapy technologies market is estimated at US$7,041.3 million in 2024 and is projected to grow at a CAGR of 10.7% during the forecast period 2024-2034.

The rise in chronic diseases like cancer, cardiovascular issues, and autoimmune disorders has created a pressing need for effective treatments. Supportive regulatory frameworks have encouraged the development & commercialization of cell therapies. Additionally, increased awareness and acceptance of these therapies among healthcare professionals and patients are driving demand further. Advancements in cell therapies offer lucrative opportunities for market players. Companies are focusing on enhancing the efficacy & safety of these therapies to provide better disease management outcomes for patients.

Download Exclusive Sample of Report https://www.visiongain.com/report/cell-therapy-technologies-market-2024/#download_sampe_div

How has COVID-19 had a Significant Impact on the Cell Therapy Technologies Market?

The COVID-19 pandemic has affected the market for cell therapy technologies market significantly. The pandemic initially caused significant disruptions to the manufacturing and supply chains of numerous industries, including the biotechnology sector. As a result, there were delays in cell therapy clinical trials, regulatory approvals, and commercialization initiatives. Furthermore, the shift in healthcare resources towards the management of the pandemic led to a reduction in funding and attention for medical research unrelated to COVID-19, such as the development of cell therapies.

However, the pandemic also made clear how crucial cutting-edge medical innovations like cell therapies are to solving the world's health crises. Consequently, there has been a surge in interest and funding for the study and advancement of cell therapy as a means of treating not only COVID-19 but also other chronic illnesses and infectious diseases. Additionally, the pandemic's adoption of telemedicine and remote monitoring has sped up the acceptance of decentralised clinical trials, which could advance cell therapy technologies by lowering trial costs and increasing patient access. The COVID-19 pandemic has, in the long run, created opportunities for innovation, collaboration, and growth, even though it initially presented challenges to the cell therapy technology market. The cell therapy sector is positioned to have a significant impact on how healthcare and illness management are provided in the future, even as the globe struggles to cope with the pandemic's aftermath.

How will this Report Benefit you?

Visiongains 305-page report provides 109 tables and 173 charts/graphs. Our new study is suitable for anyone requiring commercial, in-depth analyses for the cell therapy technologies market, along with detailed segment analysis in the market. Our new study will help you evaluate the overall global and regional market for Cell Therapy Technologies. Get financial analysis of the overall market and different segments including product, cell type, process, end-users and capture higher market share. We believe that there are strong opportunities in this fast-growing cell therapy technologies market. See how to use the existing and upcoming opportunities in this market to gain revenue benefits in the near future. Moreover, the report will help you to improve your strategic decision-making, allowing you to frame growth strategies, reinforce the analysis of other market players, and maximise the productivity of the company.

What are the Current Market Drivers?

Rise in Prevalence of Chronic & Degenerative Diseases

The healthcare sector faces numerous challenges from chronic illnesses like cancer, heart disease, neurological ailments, and autoimmune disorders. The management or cure of many disorders is frequently only partially successful with conventional therapeutic options.

With the ability to replace, regenerate, or repair damaged tissues or organs, cell therapy presents a viable substitute. Much emphasis has been paid to cell treatments' capacity to treat diseases at their root and encourage long-term healing.

Notable advancements in cell treatment technologies have been made over time to address degenerative and chronic illnesses. For example, developments in stem cell research have made it possible to identify and isolate several types of stem cells, each with a unique therapeutic potential. In order to create novel cell-based therapeutics, researchers are looking into the utilisation of hematopoietic stem cells, induced pluripotent stem cells, and mesenchymal stem cells.

Rigorous Efforts by Companies Towards Development of Proprietary & Supportive Technologies Anticipated to Boost Industry Growth

In regenerative medicine, cell therapy, which employs living cells to treat or cure diseases, has emerged as a promising area of study. Nevertheless, the efficacy of cell therapies is contingent upon the accessibility of cutting-edge technologies that facilitate the production, characterization, and transportation of cells.

Significant investments are being made by companies in the cell therapy industry in research and development of proprietary technologies that improve the safety, effectiveness, and scalability of cell therapies. The technologies in question comprise an extensive array of domains, such as tools for cell characterization, cell isolation and expansion techniques, and cryopreservation methods.

The advancement of cell culture systems is a primary area of emphasis. Organisations are currently engaged in the development and refinement of culture media, growth factors, and bioreactors that establish an optimal milieu for cellular proliferation while preserving the viability and functionality of the cells. The primary objectives of these proprietary culture systems are to increase cell yields, decrease production expenses, and facilitate the scalable production of cell therapies.

Considerable interest is being devoted to supportive technologies that affect cell isolation and purification. Innovative methods are being developed by businesses to isolate particular cell populations from complex mixtures, thereby ensuring the quality and purity of cells used in therapies. These technologies reduce the possibility of contamination or undesired cell populations while facilitating the efficient isolation of therapeutic cell types.

Cryopreservation technologies are indispensable for the transportation and long-term storage of cells. Organisations are presently preoccupied with the advancement of cryopreservation techniques that preserve the genetic stability, viability, and functionality of cells throughout the freezing and thawing processes.

These developments guarantee the presence of viable cells during therapy administration, notwithstanding the logistical obstacles that may arise from cell storage and transportation.

The development of proprietary and supportive technologies will therefore likely contribute to the expansion of the global market for cell therapy technologies.

Get Detailed ToC https://www.visiongain.com/report/cell-therapy-technologies-market-2024/

Where are the Market Opportunities?

Emerging nations present a substantial potential for the progression and integration of cell therapy technologies. These countries are currently experiencing notable advancements in their healthcare systems, as significant financial resources are being allocated to accommodate the growth of their populations. Concurrent with this growth, developing nations are confronted with an increasing prevalence of chronic and non-communicable ailments as a result of urbanisation, alterations in lifestyles, and the ageing of their populations. Cell therapy technologies are of particular relevance in these regions due to the innovative solutions they offer to address these urgent medical needs.

Moreover, in comparison to developed countries, the execution of clinical trials in emerging economies frequently demonstrates greater cost-effectiveness, predominantly attributable to reduced labour and operational expenditures. The financial benefits associated with this incentive motivate pharmaceutical companies and research institutions to investigate and advance cell therapies in these areas. Furthermore, numerous developing nations provide favourable regulatory structures and incentives in order to promote the progress and acceptance of cutting-edge medical technologies, such as cell therapies. The convergence of these elements renders developing nations an optimal setting for the proliferation and integration of cell therapy technologies, holding the potential to yield substantial advantages for healthcare providers and patients.

Competitive Landscape

The major players operating in the cell therapy technologies market are Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc., Novartis AG, Gilead Sciences, Inc., Merck KGaA, Danaher Corporation, Bristol-Myers Squibb Company, Sartorius AG, FUJIFILM Diosynth Biotechnologies, Lonza, GE Healthcare, Terumo BCT, Avantor, Inc., Bio-Techne Corporation, and Corning Incorporated among others. These major players operating in this market have adopted various strategies comprising M&A, investment in R&D, collaborations, partnerships, regional business expansion, and new product launch.

Recent Developments

To access the data contained in this document please emailcontactus@visiongain.com. Avoid missing out by staying informed order our report now.

To find more Visiongain research reports on the Pharma sector, click on the following links:

Do you have any custom requirements we can help you with?Any need for a specific country, geo region, market segment or specific company information? Contact us today, we can discuss your needs and see how we can help:contactus@visiongain.com

About Visiongain

Visiongain is one of the fastest-growing and most innovative independent market intelligence providers around, the company publishes hundreds of market research reports which it adds to its extensive portfolio each year. These reports offer in-depth analysis across 18 industries worldwide. The reports, which cover 10-year forecasts, are hundreds of pages long, with in-depth market analysis and valuable competitive intelligence data. Visiongain works across a range of vertical markets with a lot of synergies. These markets include automotive, aviation, chemicals, cyber, defence, energy, food & drink, materials, packaging, pharmaceutical and utilities sectors. Our customised and syndicatedmarket research reportsoffer a bespoke piece of market intelligence customised to your very own business needs.

Contact

Visiongain Reports Limited Telephone: +44 (0) 20 7336 6100 Email:contactus@visiongain.com Web:www.visiongain.com

Visit link:
Cell Therapy Technologies market is projected to grow at a CAGR of 10.7% by 2034: Visiongain - GlobeNewswire

Report Cites ‘Misinformation,’ ‘Remarkably Weak’ Evidence to Support Use of Puberty Blockers and Cross-Sex … – CatholicVote org

A long-awaited final report on the state of treatment for gender dysphoria in children and teens under the care of Englands National Health Service (NHS) has revealed the current clinical approach utilizing puberty blockers and cross-sex hormones is based on remarkably weak evidence stemming from poor quality of the published studies, and misinformation while exhibiting expectations of care that are far from usual clinical practice.

In the foreword to the report, British pediatrician Dr. Hilary Cass, who led an independent review team from the University of York, wrote that while the medical field is usually cautious in recommending new treatments for children and teens, quite the reverse happened in the field of gender care for children:

This is an area of remarkably weak evidence, and yet results of studies are exaggerated or misrepresented by people on all sides of the debate to support their viewpoint. The reality is that we have no good evidence on the long-term outcomes of interventions to manage gender-related distress.

[T]he toxicity of the debate is exceptional, Cass said about the issue of medical gender treatments for children. The knowledge and expertise of experienced clinicians who have reached different conclusions about the best approach to care are sometimes dismissed and invalidated.

The reports summary clearly asserts that, while some think the clinical approach should be based on a social justice model, the NHS works in an evidence-based way.

Our current understanding of the long-term health impacts of hormone interventions is limited, the review notes as it also acknowledges the rapid surge in referrals for such medical treatment.

The numbers of children and young people presenting to the UK NHS Gender Identity Service (GIDS) has been increasing year on year since 2009, with an exponential rise in 2014, the report observes, noting the use of puberty blockers began following the emergence of the Dutch Protocol.

The review team stressed the rapid push to utilize puberty blockers, despite any evidence showing effectiveness:

Preliminary results from the early intervention study in 2015-2016 did not demonstrate benefit. The results of the study were not formally published until 2020, at which time it showed there was a lack of any positive measurable outcomes. Despite this, from 2014 puberty blockers moved from a research-only protocol to being available in routine clinical practice and were given to a broader group of patients who would not have met the inclusion criteria of the original protocol.

The systematic review by the University of York found multiple studies that show puberty blockers not only suppress puberty, but also compromise bone density.

Yet, evidence regarding the use of puberty blockers and cross-sex hormones to treat gender dysphoria had already been shown to be weak, with a lot of misinformation easily accessible online and remaining currently, the review stated.

The World Professional Association of Transgender Healthcare (WPATH) has been highly influential in directing international practice, although its guidelines were found by the University of York appraisal process to lack developmental rigour, the report asserts.

In March, leaked internal files from WPATH, often touted by Dr. Rachel (born Richard) Levine, a top Biden HHS official, as the premier organization for evidence-based treatment recommendations, revealed its doctors acknowledging children and teens were not capable of comprehending the possible long-term effects of the treatments and surgeries they were prescribed.

The review team notes that while research suggests gender expression is influenced by biological predisposition, early childhood experiences, sexuality and expectations of puberty, and, therefore, requires a multi-disciplinary team approach to assessing the problem areas for each individual child, the most striking problem is the lack of any consensus on the purpose of the assessment process.

Some service users and advocates view an extensive exploration of other conditions and diagnoses as an attempt to find any other reason for the persons distress other than them being trans, the team observes.

While the report states there are some young people for whom medical treatment for gender dysphoria will be the best outcome, it notes as well young adults looking back at their younger selves would often advise slowing down as they and their parents weigh the ramifications.

Some may transition and then de/retransition and/or experience regret, the review acknowledges, concluding a medical pathway is not the best treatment protocol for the majority of young people:

[T]he focus on the use of puberty blockers for managing gender-related distress has overshadowed the possibility that other evidence-based treatments may be more effective. The intent of psychosocial intervention is not to change the persons perception of who they are, but to work with them to explore their concerns and experiences and help alleviate their distress regardless of whether or not the young person subsequently proceeds on a medical pathway.

[N]o changes in gender dysphoria or body satisfaction were demonstrated as a result of puberty blockers, the report plainly asserts.

The review team also addressed the controversy over social transition what has become known as the initial phase of so-called gender-affirming care.

The systematic review showed no clear evidence that social transition in childhood has any positive or negative mental health outcomes, and relatively weak evidence for any effect in adolescence, the report concludes. However, those who had socially transitioned at an earlier age and/or prior to being seen in clinic were more likely to proceed to a medical pathway.

Reviewers similarly found no support for the claim by transgender activists that administering puberty blockers allows time for children and their families to consider further medical intervention:

[G]iven that the vast majority of young people started on puberty blockers proceed from puberty blockers to masculinising/ feminising hormones, there is no evidence that puberty blockers buy time to think, and some concern that they may change the trajectory of psychosexual and gender identity development.

There is a lack of high-quality research assessing the outcomes of hormone interventions in adolescents with gender dysphoria/incongruence, and few studies that undertake long-term follow-up, the review team explains.

In addition, reviewers found no evidence to support the transition or die claim that hormone treatment prevents a high risk of suicide in minors with gender dysphoria.

>> FINNISH STUDY: GENDER-AFFIRMING CARE DOES NOT REDUCE YOUTH SUICIDE <<

The primary predictor of death in gender-dysphoric young people is psychiatric morbidity, the researchers said. Medical gender reassignment does not have an impact on suicide risk.

The current evidence base suggests that children who present with gender incongruence at a young age are most likely to desist before puberty, although for a small number the incongruence will persist, the Cass report concludes.

This final report stresses the need for a holistic assessment of children and teens referred for gender services:

This should include screening for neurodevelopmental conditions, including autism spectrum disorder, and a mental health assessment.

Standard evidence based psychological and psychopharmacological treatment approaches should be used to support the management of the associated distress and cooccurring conditions, the team recommends. This should include support for parents/carers and siblings as appropriate.

The release of the Cass report comes only days after Dignitas Infinita on Human Dignity, the most recent document from the Dicastery for the Doctrine of the Faith (DDF), was issued.

The DDF declaration addresses human dignity and reaffirms traditional teachings of the Church, including those on gender ideology and sex-change surgery.

>> READ CVS ANALYSIS OF DIGNITAS INFINITA HERE <<

More:
Report Cites 'Misinformation,' 'Remarkably Weak' Evidence to Support Use of Puberty Blockers and Cross-Sex ... - CatholicVote org

China Genetic Testing Analysis Report 2024: Market to Reach $14.9 Billion by 2032 from $4.3 Billion in 2023, Driven … – PR Newswire

DUBLIN, March 27, 2024 /PRNewswire/ -- The"China Genetic Testing Market Report by Test Type, Disease, Technology, Service Provider, Testing Sample 2024-2032" report has been added toResearchAndMarkets.com's offering.

The China genetic testing market size reached US$ 4.3 billion in 2023. The market is projected to reach US$ 14.9 billion by 2032, exhibiting a growth rate (CAGR) of 14.9% during 2023-2032.

Genetic testing is becoming popular in China. It may benefit many different interest groups, such as individuals and families with a history of genetic disorder, pregnant women, employers, and health or life insurance. This market is currently driven by a number of factors such as rising awareness regarding the benefits of genetic testing, availability of direct to consumer tests and increasing incidences of genetic disorders.

Over the past few years, there has been a significant rise in the awareness levels regarding the benefits of genetic testing in China. Genetic testing provides various technologies that help in the early detection of various chronic diseases and ensures its treatment and prevention. Moreover, a rise in the availability of Direct to consumer tests (DTC) which has increased the convenience and accessibility of such tests is also creating a positive impact in the growth of the market.

Moreover, In October, 2015, China announced that the iconic one-child policy had finally been replaced by a universal two-child policy. This is expected to increase the number of babies born each year and create a positive impact on the demand of the new born genetic testing segment. Other major factors that are expected to drive this market include growing middle class, aging population, and expanding healthcare system.

This report provides a deep insight into the China genetic testing market covering all its essential aspects. This ranges from macro overview of the market to micro details of the industry performance, recent trends, key market drivers and challenges, SWOT analysis, Porter's five forces analysis, value chain analysis, etc. This report is a must-read for entrepreneurs, investors, researchers, consultants, business strategists, and all those who have any kind of stake or are planning to foray into the China genetic testing industry in any manner.

Key Questions Answered in This Report

Competitive Landscape

Key Market Segmentation:

Breakup by Test Type:

Breakup by Disease:

Breakup by Technology:

Breakup by Service Provider:

Breakup by Testing Sample:

For more information about this report visit https://www.researchandmarkets.com/r/ob8wjd

About ResearchAndMarkets.com ResearchAndMarkets.com is the world's leading source for international market research reports and market data. We provide you with the latest data on international and regional markets, key industries, the top companies, new products and the latest trends.

Media Contact:Research and Markets Laura Wood, Senior Manager [emailprotected] For E.S.T Office Hours Call +1-917-300-0470 For U.S./CAN Toll Free Call +1-800-526-8630 For GMT Office Hours Call +353-1-416-8900 U.S. Fax: 646-607-1907 Fax (outside U.S.): +353-1-481-1716

Logo: https://mma.prnewswire.com/media/539438/Research_and_Markets_Logo.jpg

SOURCE Research and Markets

Read the original here:
China Genetic Testing Analysis Report 2024: Market to Reach $14.9 Billion by 2032 from $4.3 Billion in 2023, Driven ... - PR Newswire

Global Advanced Therapy Medicinal Products CDMO Market Analysis Report 2024-2030: : Increasing Investment and … – Yahoo Finance UK

Global Advanced Therapy Medicinal Products CDMO Market Analysis Report 2024-2030: : Increasing Investment and ...  Yahoo Finance UK

Link:
Global Advanced Therapy Medicinal Products CDMO Market Analysis Report 2024-2030: : Increasing Investment and ... - Yahoo Finance UK

Archives