Posts Tagged ‘science’
Gene Therapy is Having its Moment: Can the Clinical Research Ecosystem Seize It? – Contract Pharma
Gene therapy research is booming. Since the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) issued its first approval for a gene therapyin 2017, oncology researchers have been breaking barriers in gene therapy trials, followed by an explosion in mRNA research during the COVID pandemic. Today, this trailblazing science is providing new ways to approach rare diseases and new hope when other investigational interventions have failed. In fact, themajorityof approved gene therapies are for rare diseases 14 are currently in Phase III trials for 10 rare diseases and 45 gene therapies are in early stages of development to treat 30 rare diseases. We see great potential for gene therapies, said Leslie Johnston, senior vice president of biotech delivery for Parexel. As more products are approved, it will gain traction and more companies will look to expand their therapies into other therapeutic indications. This progress presents tremendous potential to change more patients lives across many different diseases. This could be gene therapys moment. But to fully seize it, the industry must clear some complex hurdles. Gene therapies pose several unique challenges for clinical research, including ethical and safety considerations, regulatory hurdles, precarious logistics, and potentially staggering costs. These challenges may already be having ramifications: New U.S. patients treated with gene therapies approved or in development areexpected to fallby one-third from 2025 to 2034. The key to clearing these hurdles? Cooperation between sponsors, sites, regulators, patients, and other stakeholders is essential to expediting the advancement of life-saving gene therapies. Regulators should address risks without limiting innovation Gene therapy trials are strictly regulated and rightly so, due to the novel nature of the intervention and the potential long-term consequences. Gene therapy interventions also carry inherent safety risks, including the potential for unintended genetic changes or adverse immune reactions. Ensuring patient safety requires rigorous monitoring and adherence to strict protocols. However, obtaining regulatory approval under these conditions is time consuming and resource intensive. To avoid hampering scientific progress, regulators should aim to ensure that requirements are appropriately rigorous without being unmanageably onerous. Thankfully, the FDA is paying close attention to gene therapy and has demonstrated a desire to work with drug developers toward the success and approval of these treatments. Dr. Peter Marks, Director of the Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research (CBER) at the FDA, has expressed his hope for an exponential, if not logarithmic, increase in gene therapy approvals. There is a lot of excitement that this could potentially make a big difference for the treatment of human disease, said Dr. Marks in hisremarksto the National Press Forum last November. The FDA is going beyond mere rhapsodizing and taking action to accelerate gene therapy. Last year, the agencylaunched a pilot programcalled Support for Clinical Trials Advancing Rare Disease Therapeutics, or START. This program is designed to accelerate the development and approval process for treatments targeting rare diseases by providing regulatory guidance, assistance, and incentives to sponsors conducting clinical trials in this field. The program represents an important step forward in fostering innovation and collaboration between regulatory bodies and sponsors. In addition, the FDA is working toharmonize global requirementsfor the review of gene therapies. Encouraging and facilitating international cooperation and harmonization of regulatory standards including mutual recognition agreements and shared regulatory pathways for multinational clinical trials can help streamline gene therapy development globally and help bring innovations to patients faster. Even with this progress, regulators should continue to help accelerate gene therapy research by streamlining regulatory pathways specifically tailored to gene therapies. This means providing clear guidance on requirements for preclinical and clinical development, fostering collaboration between stakeholders to share knowledge and best practices, and offering expedited review processes for gene therapy products aimed at treating serious or life-threatening diseases. With a staggering2,500 cell and gene therapyinvestigational new drug applications (INDs) on file, the FDA approved justfivecell and gene therapies in 2023. Dr. Marks hassuggestedthat accelerated approval, which has successfully advanced cancer and HIV/AIDS treatments, may be the most appropriate path for this new category of treatments. But, regulators also need to commit to proactively partner with developers to understand the patient population and the risks and benefits of each new therapy. Likewise, researchers, industry stakeholders, and patient advocacy groups should engage with regulators to help them understand the unique challenges and opportunities in the field of gene therapy. This can help regulators adapt regulatory frameworks to ensure patient safety while expediting the development and approval of promising treatments. Sites and sponsors must be prepared Of course, sites and sponsors also have a crucial part to play in advancing this promising field of medicine. Clinical trial sites should enhance their capacity to conduct gene therapy trials safely and effectively and sponsors should do their part to assist sites in these efforts. By working closely with clinicians and regulators, sponsors can ensure that the trial development process aligns with clinical needs and regulatory standards. Sponsors should have a thorough understanding of FDA requirements pertaining to design, preclinical testing, and long-term follow-up. Better alignment from the outset will lead to more efficient trial designs, faster regulatory approvals, and ultimately quicker patient access to therapies. For example, sponsors working with mRNA and other genetically engineered therapies in North America not only have to go through institutional review board (IRB) review, they also have to navigate additional requirements from the U.S. National Institutes of Health (NIH) Office of Science PolicyGuidelines for Research Involving Recombinant or Synthetic Nucleic Acid Molecules(NIH Guidelines). These requirements usually involve an additional biosafety risk assessment review from an institutional biosafety committee (IBC) in addition to IRB review. NIH Guidelines apply for any research involving recombinant or synthetic nucleic acids (e.g. genetically engineered materials) that receives NIH support or takes place at sites that have received NIH support for such research. Even when there is zero NIH support, IBC review is considered a best practice. IBC review and inspection helps sites ensure they are fully prepared by identifying areas for improved biosafety protections and calling out gaps in current standard operating procedures (SOPs). Proactive coordination and integration of these separate review processes can speed trial timelines and help sponsors consistently address any potential concerns or issues. Sites can also be better prepared by pre-registering an IBC. The NIH takes six to eight weeks or more to approve a new registration, in addition to IBC review time so by registering an IBC before they even have a trial, sites can save a month or more in startup time over a site that waited to register. Clinical trial sites looking to host gene therapy studies must be prepared in other ways, as well, both in terms of knowledge and infrastructure. Gene therapy studies require specialized infrastructure for manufacturing, storing, and administering genetic material to adhere to strict biosafety guidelines. Something as simple as having an upholstered chair in the infusion room which would pose an unacceptable contamination risk if genetic materials were to spill would require the site to rethink their current processes. Rigorous training is also key due to the added risk of spreading genetic material to caregivers and others in close contact with patients. Research staff must be specially trained to handle, deliver, and dispose of this material safely. Of course, these measures can seem intimidating for sites that are already cost-constrained. Large academic medical centers with more resources and experience are more likely to be well-positioned for these studies. For instance, they may already have conducted bench, animal, and/or agricultural research with genetic engineering or have the funding to make any needed adjustments such as purchasing special equipment. But to maximize the potential number of sites where this research can be conducted and therefore reach more potential participants sponsors might consider providing help in the form of financial assistance, training curricula, SOP guidance, and more to smaller sites seeking to conduct gene therapy research. Logistical complexities depending on the investigational medicine and therapeutic area are among the most complicated challenges in gene therapy trials, added Johnston. From collecting the specimen from the patient, modifying it, storing it, transporting it, and then returning it back to the patient all comes with tremendously unique logistical challenges and requires equally unique equipment, technology, and expertise. And it can be cost-prohibitive. Patients must be fully on board Of course, the most essential stakeholder in any clinical trial is the patient. In gene therapy research, which can be particularly demanding, patients must have a complete understanding of and commitment to their involvement. Understanding the potential risks and benefits can help patients make informed decisions and navigate the study process. First, it's crucial for patients to adhere strictly to the protocol provided by the clinical trial team, including following medication schedules, maintaining specific hygiene practices, and attending all study visits. They should strive to maintain optimal health to enhance the body's response to gene therapy. And to avoid delays, patients should maintain open and honest communication with the clinical trial team, reporting any changes in symptoms, side effects, or general health as soon as they occur. Trial participants also need to be in it for the long haul. Because gene therapy interventions aim to produce lasting effects, even cures, they typically require long-term patient follow-up to assess efficacy and safety. But they may also need to have incredible patience. Johnston explained, There are many complexities that can impact study progress. For example, unpredictable logistical challenges like a weather event or vehicle accident could delay a temperature-sensitive delivery to a site, or data review outcomes could require an indeterminate pause period. Patience and agility are must-haves, but it is difficult for patients potentially depending on this new therapy to save or change their lives. Lastly, the industry cannot forget the patient. Involving patients and patient advocacy groups in the regulatory process can help ensure that the development of gene therapies is aligned with patient needs and priorities, as well as shed light on risk-benefit perspectives from a patients viewpoint. The more these perspectives are considered from the beginning, the greater the chance of a trials success. Rita Naman, co-founder of the Mighty Milo Foundation, emphasizes the need for a more collaborative and patient-centered approach to gene therapy development. "For ultra-rare diseases likeSPAX5, gene therapy offers a glimmer of hope where traditional treatments do not. But logistical hurdles make these therapies expensive and inaccessible, explained Naman. Closer collaboration with patients, industry, and regulators could streamline these processes, drive costs down, and speed trials. Patients like my son, and their caregivers, plus advocacy groups should be invited into the earliest discussions to prevent false starts or missed milestones in gene therapy development especially as the patients priorities dont always line up with the sponsors. In the fight for gene therapy breakthroughs, cooperation is key. The road to operationalizing gene therapy clinical trials is laced with land mines and potholes. To capture the full potential of novel gene therapy research, a new level of collaboration between sponsors, CROs, sites, oversight committees, regulatory bodies, and patients is paramount. Patients want access to novel gene treatments, and they want it fast. Sponsors want to deliver but fight logistical and financial obstacles. Regulators want to ensure safety first, especially considering such new, promising science, concluded Johnston. These three goals may seem conflicting at times, so we need to strike a balance of safety and speed, so patients dont miss their only potential treatment opportunity. A seasoned industry veteran with more than 25 years of experience, James Riddle is senior vice president of global review operations at Advarra. Riddles expertise includes large program management and growth, operational processes, development and implementation of technology solutions, and management of large Human Research Protection Programs (HRPP), Biosafety programs (IBC) and Institutional Animal Care and Use programs (IACUC). Riddle has directed numerous clients in achieving Part 11 compliance and meeting computer system validation requirements.
See original here:
Gene Therapy is Having its Moment: Can the Clinical Research Ecosystem Seize It? - Contract Pharma
The New Transformers: Innovators in Regenerative Medicine – NYAS – The New York Academy of Sciences
Overview
The human body regenerates itself constantly, replacing old, worn-out cells with a continuous supply of new ones in almost all tissues. The secret to this perpetual renewal is a small but persistent supply of stem cells, which multiply to replace themselves and also generate progeny that can differentiate into more specialized cell types. For decades, scientists have tried to isolate and modify stem cells to treat disease, but in recent years the field has accelerated dramatically.
A major breakthrough came in the early 21st century, when researchers in Japan figured out how to reverse the differentiation process, allowing them to derive induced pluripotent stem (iPS) cells from fully differentiated cells. Since then, iPS cells have become a cornerstone of regenerative medicine. Researchers can isolate cells from a patient, produce iPS cells, genetically modify them to repair any defects, then induce the cells to form the tissue the patient needs regenerated.
On April 26, 2019, the New York Academy of Sciences and Takeda Pharmaceuticals hosted the Frontiers in Regenerative Medicine Symposium to celebrate 2019 Innovators in Science Award winners and highlight the work of researchers pioneering techniques in regenerative medicine. Presentations and an interactive panel session covered exciting basic research findings and impressive clinical successes, revealing the immense potential of this rapidly developing field.
Shinya Yamanaka Kyoto University
Shruti Naik New York University
Michele De Luca University of Modena and Reggio Emilia
Masayo Takahashi RIKEN Center for Biosystems Dynamics Research
Hiromitsu Nakauchi Stanford University and University of Tokyo
Brigid L.M. Hogan Duke University School of Medicine
Emmanuelle Passegu Columbia University Irving Medical Center
Hans Schler Max Planck Institute for Molecular Biomedicine
Austin Smith University of Cambridge
Moderator: Azim Surani University of Cambridge
Shinya Yamanaka Kyoto University
Shinya Yamanakaof Kyoto University, gave the meetings keynote presentation, summarizing his laboratorys recent work using induced pluripotent stem (iPS) cells for regenerative medicine. The first clinical trial using iPS cells to treat age-related macular degeneration started five years ago. In his clinical trial, physicians isolated somatic cells from a patient, then used developed culture techniques to derive iPS cells from them. iPS cells can proliferate and differentiate into any type of cell in the body, which can then be transplanted back into the patient. Experiments over the past five years have shown that this approach has the potential to treat diseases ranging from age-related macular degeneration to Parkinsons disease.
However, this autologous transplantation strategy is slow and expensive. It takes up to a year just evaluating one patient, [and] it costs us almost one million US dollars, said Yamanaka. Before transplanting the differentiated cells, the researchers evaluated the entire iPS cell derivation and iPS cell differentiation processes, adding to time and cost. As another strategy, Yamanakas team is working on the iPS Cell Stock for Regenerative Medicine. Here, iPS cells are derived from blood cells of healthy donors, not the patients, and are stocked. The primary problem with this approach is the human leukocyte antigen (HLA) system, which encodes multiple cell surface proteins. Each person has a specific combination of HLA genes, or haplotype, defining the HLA proteins expressed on their own cells. The immune system recognizes and eliminates any cell expressing non-self HLA proteins. Because there are millions of potential HLA haplotypes, cells derived from one person will likely be rejected by another.
The homozygous superdonor cell line has limited immunological diversity, allowing it to match multiple patients.
To address that, Yamanaka and his colleagues are collaborating with the Japanese Red Cross to develop superdonor iPS cells. These cells carry homozygous alleles for different human lymphocyte antigen (HLA) genes, limiting their immunological diversity and making them match multiple patients. So far, the team has created four superdonor cell lines, allowing them to generate cells compatible with 40% of the Japanese population. Those cells are now being used in clinical trials treating macular degeneration and Parkinsons disease, with more indications planned.
So far so good, said Yamanaka, but he added that in order to cover 90% of the Japanese population we would need 150 iPS cell lines, and in order to cover the entire world we would need over 1,000 lines. It took the group about five years to generate the first four lines, so simply repeating the process that many more times isnt practical.
Instead, Yamanaka hopes to take the HLA reduction a step further, knocking out most of the major HLA genes to generate cells that will survive in large swaths of the population. However, simply knocking out entire families of genes isnt enough. Natural killer cells attack cells that are missing particular cell surface antigens, so the researchers had to leave specific markers in the cells, or reintroduce them transgenically. Natural killer and T cells from various donors ignore leukocytes derived from these highly engineered iPS cells, proving that the concept works. With this approach, just ten lines of iPS cells should yield a range of donor cells suitable for any human HLA combination. Yamanaka expects these gene-edited iPS cells to be available in 2020.
By 2025, Yamanaka hopes to announce my iPS cell technology. This technology will reduce the cost and time for autologous transplantation to about $10,000 and one month per patient.
While preclinical and early clinical trials on iPS cells have yielded promising results, the new therapies must still cross the valley of death, the pharmaceutical industrys term for the unsuccessful transition and industrialization of innovative ideas identified in academia to routine clinical use. In an effort to make that process more reliable, Yamanaka and his colleagues have begun a unique collaboration with Takeda Pharmaceutical Company Limited, Japans largest drug maker. The effort involves 100 scientists, 50 each from the company and academic laboratories. The corporate researchers gain access to the latest basic science developments on iPS cell technology, while the academics can use the companys cutting-edge R&D know-how equipment and vast chemical libraries.
In one project, the collaborators used iPS cells to derive pancreatic islet cells, and then encapsulated the cells in an implantable device to treat type 1 diabetes. The system successfully decreased blood glucose in a mouse model, and the team is now scaling up cell production to test it in humans in the future. Another effort identified chemicals in Takedas compound library that speed cardiomyocyte maturation, which the researchers are now using to improve iPS cell-derived treatments for heart failure. In a third project, the team has modified iPS cell-derived T cells to identify and attack tumors, again showing promising results in a mouse model.
Shruti Naik New York University
Michele De Luca University of Modena and Reggio Emilia
Shruti Naik, Early-Career Scientist winner of the 2019 Innovators in Science Award, discussed her work on epithelial barriers. These barriers, which include skin and the linings of the gut, lungs, and urogenital tract, exhibit nuanced responses to the many microbes they encounter. Injuries and pathogenic infections trigger prompt inflammatory responses, but the millions of harmless commensal bacteria that live on these surfaces dont. How does the epithelium know the difference?
To ask that question, Naik first studied germ-free mice, which lack all types of bacteria. These animals have defective immune responses against pathogens that affect epithelia, so commensal bacteria are clearly required for developing normal epithelial immunity. Naik inoculated the germ-free mice with bacterial strains found either on the skin or in the guts of normal mice, then assessed their immune responses in those two compartments.
When you gave gut-tropic bacteria, you were essentially able to rescue immunity in the gut but not the skin, and conversely when you gave skin-tropic bacteria, you were able to rescue immunity in the skin and not the gut, said Naik. Even though the commensal bacteria caused no inflammation, they did activate certain T cells in the epithelia they colonized, apparently preparing those tissues for subsequent attacks by pathogens.
Next, Naik took germ-free mice inoculated with Staphylococcus epidermidis, a normal skin commensal bacterium, and challenged them with an infection by Candida albicans, a pathogenic yeast. The bacterially primed mice produced a much more robust immune response against the yeast infection than control animals that hadnt gotten S. epidermidis. Naik confirmed that this immune training effect operates through the T cell response shed seen before. You essentially develop an immune arsenal to your commensals that helps protect against pathogens, Naik explained, adding that each epithelial barrier requires its own commensal bacteria to trigger this response.
Augmented wound repair in post-inflammation skin reveals that naive and inflammation-educated skin stem cells respond differently to subsequent stresses.
The response to epithelial commensals is remarkably durable; Naik found that the skin T cells in the inoculated mice remained on alert a year after their initial activation. That led her to wonder whether non-hematopoietic cells, especially epithelial stem cells, contribute to immunological memory in the skin.
To probe that, Naik and a colleague used a mouse model in which the topical drug imiquimod induces a temporary psoriasis-like skin inflammation. By tracing the lineages of cells in the animals skin, the researchers found that epithelial stem cells expand during this inflammation, and then persist. Challenging the mice with a wound one month after the inflammation resolves leads to faster healing than if the mice hadnt had the inflammation. Several other models of wound healing yielded the same result. The investigators concluded that naive and inflammation-educated skin stem cells respond differently to subsequent stresses.
Naiks team found that inflammation causes persistent changes in skin stem cells chromatin organization. Using a clever reporter gene assay, they demonstrated that the initial inflammation leaves inflammatory gene loci more open in the chromatin, making them easier to activate after subsequent insults. What was really surprising to us was that this change never fully resolved, said Naik. Even six months after the acute inflammation, skin stem cells retained the distinct post-inflammatory chromatin structure and the ability to heal wounds quickly. This chronic ready-for-action state isnt always beneficial, though. Naik noticed that the mice that had had the inflammatory treatment were more prone to developing tumors, for example.
In establishing her new laboratory, Naik has now turned her focus to another aspect of epithelial immunity: the link between immune responses and tissue regeneration. She looked first at a type of T cells found in abundance around hair follicles on skin. Mice lacking these cells exhibit severe delays in wound healing, apparently as a result of failing to vascularize the wound area. That implies a previously unknown role for inflammatory T cells in vascularization, which Naik and her lab are now probing.
Michele De Luca, Senior Scientist winner of the 2019 Innovators in Science Award, has developed techniques for regenerating human skin from transgenic epidermal stem cells. Researchers first isolated holoclones, or cells derived from a single epidermal stem cell, over 30 years ago. These cells can be used to grow sheets of skin in culture for both research and clinical use, but scientists have only recently begun to elucidate how the process works.
The first stem cell-derived therapies tested in humans were for skin and eye burns, allowing doctors to regenerate and replace burned epidermal tissue from a patients own stem cells. Thats the basis of Holoclar, a stem cell-based treatment for severe eye burns approved in Europe in 2015.
Holoclar and similar procedures work well for injured patients with normal epithelia. We wanted to genetically modify those cells in order to address one of the most important genetic diseases in the dermatology field, which is epidermolysis bullosa (EB), a devastating skin disease, said De Luca. In EB, patients carry a genetic defect in cell adhesion that causes severe blisters all over their skin and prevents normal healing. A large number of EB patients die as children from the resulting infections, and those who survive seldom get beyond young adulthood before succumbing to squamous cell carcinomas.
De Luca developed a strategy to isolate stem cells from a skin biopsy, repair the genetic defect in these cells with a retroviral vector, and then grow new skin in culture that can be transplanted back to the patient, replacing their original skin with genetically repaired skin. In 2015, the researchers carried out the procedure on a young boy named Hassan, who had arrived in the burn unit of a German hospital with EB after fleeing Syria. The burn unit was only able to offer palliative care, and his prognosis was poor because of his constant blistering and infections. De Lucas team received approval to perform their gene therapy on him.
The new strategy, which combines cell and gene therapy, resulted in the restoration of normal skin adhesion in Hassan.
After isolating and modifying epidermal stem cells from Hassan and growing new sheets of skin in culture, De Lucas team re-skinned the patients arms and legs, then his abdomen and back. The complete procedure took about three months. The new skin resists blister formation even when rubbed and heals normally from minor wounds. In the ensuing three and a half years, Hassan has begun growing normally and living an ordinary, healthy life.
Detailed analysis of skin biopsies showed that Hassans epidermis has normal cellular adhesion machinery and revealed that his skin is now derived from a population of proliferating transgenic stem cells, with no single clone dominating. By tracing the lineages of cells carrying the introduced transgene, De Luca was able to identify self-renewing transgenic stem cells, intermediate progenitor cells, and fully differentiated stem cells, indicating normal skin growth and replacement.
Besides being good news for the patient, the results confirmed a longstanding theory of skin regeneration. These data formally prove that the human epidermis is sustained only by a small population of long-lived stem cells that generates [short-lived epithelial] progenitors, said De Luca, adding that with this in mind, weve started doing other clinical trials.
The researchers plan to continue targeting junctional as well as dystrophic forms of EB, both of which are genetically distinct from EB simplex. Initial experiments revealed that in these conditions, transplant recipients developed mosaic skin, where some areas continued to be produced from cells lacking the introduced genetic repair. The non-transgenic cells appeared to be out-competing the transgenic cells and supplanting them, undermining the treatment. De Luca and his colleagues developed a modified strategy that gave the transgenic cells a competitive advantage. This approach and additional advances should allow them to achieve complete transgenic skin coverage.
Masayo Takahashi RIKEN Center for Biosystems Dynamics Research
Hiromitsu Nakauchi Stanford University and University of Tokyo
Masayo Takahashi, of RIKEN Center for Biosystems Dynamics Research, began her talk with a brief description of the new Kobe Eye Center, a purpose-built facility designed to house a complete clinical development pipeline dedicated to curing eye diseases. Not only cells, not only treatments, but a whole care system is needed to cure the patients, said Takahashi. In keeping with that philosophy, the Center includes everything from research laboratories to a working eye hospital and a patient welfare facility.
Takahashis recent work has focused on treating age-related macular degeneration (AMD). In AMD, the retinal pigment epithelium that nourishes other retinal cells accumulates damage, leading to progressive vision loss. AMD is the most common cause of serious visual impairment in the elderly in the US and EU, and there is no definitive treatment. Fifteen years ago, Takahashi and her colleagues derived retinal pigment epithelial cells from monkey embryonic stem cells and successfully transplanted them into a rat model of AMD, treating the condition in the rodents. They were hesitant to extend the technique to humans, though, because it required suppressing the recipients immune response to prevent them from rejecting the monkey cells.
The advent of induced pluripotent stem (iPS) cell technology pointed Takahashi toward a new strategy, in which she took cells from a patient, derived iPS cells from them, and then prompted those cells to differentiate into retinal pigment epithelial cells that were perfectly compatible with the patients immune system. Her team then transplanted a sheet of these cells into the patient. That experiment, in 2014, was the first clinical use of iPS cells in humans. The grafted cells were very stable, said Takahashi, who has checked the graft in multiple ways in the ensuing years.
Having proven that iPS cell-derived retinal grafts can work, Takahashi and her colleagues sought to make the procedure cheaper and faster. Creating customized iPS cells from each patient is a huge undertaking, so instead the team investigated superdonor iPS cells that can be used for multiple patients. These cells, described by Shinya Yamanaka in his keynote address, express fewer types of human leukocyte antigens than most patients, making them immunologically compatible with large swaths of the population. Just four lines of superdonor iPS cells can be used to derive grafts for 40% of all Japanese people.
Transplantation of an iPS cell-derived sheet into the retina ultimately proved successful.
In the next clinical trial, Takahashis lab performed several tests to confirm that the patients immune cells would not react with the superdonor cells, before proceeding with the first retinal pigment epithelial graft. Nonetheless, after the graft the researchers saw a minuscule fluid pocket in the patients retina, apparently due to an immune reaction. Clinicians immediately gave the patient topical steroids in the eye to suppress the reaction. Then after three weeks or so, the reaction ceased and the fluid was gone, so we could control the immune reaction to the HLA-matched cells, said Takahashi. Four subsequent patients showed no reaction whatsoever to the iPS superdonor-derived grafts.
While the retinal grafts were successful, none of the patients have shown much improvement in visual acuity so far. Takahashi explained that subjects in the clinical trial all had very severe AMD and extensive loss of their eyes photoreceptors. I think if we select the right patients, we could get good visual acuity if their photoreceptors still remain, said Takahashi.
Takahashi finished with a brief overview of her other projects, including using aggregates of iPS cells and embryonic stem cells to form organoids, which can self-organize into a retina. She hopes to use this system to develop new therapies for retinitis pigmentosa, another major cause of vision loss. Finally, Takahashi described a project aimed at reducing the cost and increasing the efficacy of stem cell therapies even further by employing a sophisticated laboratory robot. The system, called Mahoro, is capable of learning techniques from the best laboratory technicians, then replicating them perfectly. That should make stem cell culturing procedures much more reproducible and significantly reduce the cost of deploying new therapies.
Hiromitsu Nakauchi, of Stanford University and the University of Tokyo, described his groups efforts to overcome a decades-old challenge in stem cell research. Scientists have known for over 25 years that all of the blood cells in a human are renewed from a tiny population of multipotent, self-renewing hematopoietic stem cells. In an animal thats had all of its hematopoietic lineages eliminated by ionizing radiation, a single such cell can reconstitute the entire blood cell population. This protocol is the basis for several experimental models.
In theory, then, a single hematopoietic stem cell should also be able to multiply indefinitely in pure culture, allowing researchers to produce all types of blood cells on demand. In practice, cultured stem cells inevitably differentiate and die off after just a few generations in culture. Nakauchi and his colleagues have been trying to fix that problem. After years of hard work, we decided to take the reductionist approach and try to define the components that we use to culture [hematopoietic stem cells], said Nakauchi.
The team focused on the most undefined component of their culture media: bovine serum albumin (BSA). This substance, a crude extract from cow blood, has been considered an essential component of growth media since researchers first managed to culture mammalian cells. However, Nakauchis lab found tremendous variation between different lots of BSA, both in the types and quantities of various impurities in them and in their efficacy in keeping stem cells alive. Worse, factors that appeared to be helpful to the cells in some BSA lots were harmful when present in other lots. So this is not science; depending on the BSA lot you use, you get totally different results, said Nakauchi.
Next, the researchers switched to a recombinant serum albumin product made in genetically engineered yeast. That exhibited less variation between lots, and after optimizing their culture conditions they were able to grow and expand hematopoietic stem cells for nearly a month. Part of the protocol they developed was to change the medium every other day, which they found was required to remove inflammatory cytokines and chemokines being produced by the stem cells. That suggested the cells were still under stress, perhaps in response to some of the components of the recombinant serum albumin.
Polyvinyl alcohol can replace BSA in culture medium.
The ongoing problems with serum albumin products led Nakauchi to ask why albumin is even necessary in tissue culture. Scientists have known for decades that cells dont grow well without it, but why not? While trying to figure out what the albumin was doing for the cells, Nakauchis lab tested it against the most inert polymer they could find: polyvinyl alcohol (PVA). Best known as the primary ingredient for making school glue, PVA is also used extensively in the food and pharmaceutical industries. To their surprise, hematopoietic stem cells grew better in PVA-spiked medium than in medium with BSA. The PVA-grown cells showed decreased senescence, lower levels of inflammatory cytokines, and better growth rates.
In long-term culture, Nakauchi and his colleagues were able to achieve more than 900-fold expansion of functional mouse hematopoietic stem cells. Transplanting these cells into irradiated mice confirmed that the cells were still fully capable of reconstituting all of the hematopoietic lineages. Further experiments determined that PVA-containing medium also works well for human hematopoietic stem cells.
Besides having immediate uses for basic research, the ability to grow such large numbers of hematopoietic stem cells could overcome a fundamental barrier to using these cells in the clinic. Current hematopoietic stem cell therapies require suppressing or destroying a patients existing immune system to allow the transplanted cells to become established, but this immunosuppression can lead to deadly infections. Transplanting a much larger population of stem cells can overcome the need for immunosuppression, but growing enough cells for this approach has been impractical. Using their new culture techniques, Nakauchis team can now produce enough hematopoietic stem cells to carry out successful transplants without immunosuppression in mice. They hope to take this approach into the clinic soon.
Brigid L.M. Hogan Duke University School of Medicine
Emmanuelle Passegu Columbia University Irving Medical Center
Hans Schler Max Planck Institute for Molecular Biomedicine
Austin Smith University of Cambridge
Moderator: Azim Surani University of Cambridge
Austin Smith, from the University of Cambridge, gave the final presentation, in which he discussed his studies on the progression of embryonic stem cells through development. In mammals, embryonic development begins with the formation of the blastocyst. In 1981, researchers isolated cells from murine blastocysts and demonstrated that each of them can grow into a complete embryo. Stem cells isolated after the embryo has implanted itself into the uterus, called epiblast stem cells, have lost that ability but gained the potential to differentiate into multiple cell lineages in culture. So we have two different types of pluripotent stem cells in the mouse, and theyre different in just about every way you could imagine, said Smith.
Work on other species, including human cells, suggests that this transition between two different types of stem cells is a common feature of mammalian development. The transition from the earlier to the later type of stem cell is called capacitation. To find the factors driving capacitation, Smith and his colleagues looked for differences in gene transcription patterns and chromatin organization during the process, in both human and murine cells. What they found was a global re-wiring of nearly every aspect of the cells physiology. Together these things lead to the acquisition of both germline and somatic lineage competence, and at the same time decommission that extra-embryonic lineage potential, Smith explained.
Having characterized the cells before and after capacitation, the researchers wanted to isolate cells from intermediate stages of the process to understand how it unfolds. To do that, they extracted cells from mouse embryos right after implantation, then grew them in culture conditions that minimized their exposure to signals that would direct them toward specific lineages. Detailed analyses of these cells, which Smith calls formative stem cells, shows that they have characteristics of both the naive embryonic stem cells and the later epiblast stem cells. Injecting these cells into mouse blastocysts yields chimeric mice carrying descendants of the injected cells in all their tissues. The formative stem cells can therefore function like true embryonic stem cells, albeit less efficiently.
The developmental sequence of pluripotent cells.
Post-implantation human embryos arent available for research, but Smiths team was able to culture naive stem cells and prompt them to develop into formative stem cells. These cells exhibit transcriptional profiles and other characteristics homologous to those seen in the murine formative stem cells.
Having found the intermediate cell type, Smith was now able to assemble a more detailed view of the steps in development. Returning to the mouse model, he compared the chromatin organization of naive embryonic, formative, and epiblast stem cells. The difference between the naive and formative cells chromatin was much more dramatic than between the formative and epiblast cells.
Based on the results, Smith proposes that naive embryonic stem cells begin as a blank slate, which then undergoes capacitation to become primed to respond to later differentiation signals. The capacitation process entails a dramatic change in the cells transcriptional and chromatin organization and occurs around the time of implantation. We think we now have in culture a cell that represents this intermediate stage and that has distinctive functional properties and distinctive molecular properties, said Smith. After capacitation, the formative stem cells undergo a more gradual shift to become primed stem cells, which are the epiblast stem cells in mice.
Smith concedes that the human data are less detailed, but all of the experiments his team was able to do produced results consistent with the mouse model. Other work has also found corroborating results in non-human primate embryos, implying that the same developmental mechanisms are conserved across mammals.
After the presentations, a panel consisting of members of the Innovators in Science Awards Scientific Advisory Council and Jury took the stage to address a series of questions from the audience.
The panel first took up the question of how researchers can better study human stem cells, given the ethical challenges of working with embryos. Brigid Hogan described organoid cultures, in which researchers stimulate human iPS cells to grow into minuscule organ-like structures. This is a way of looking at human development at a stage when its [otherwise] completely inaccessible, said Hogan. Other speakers concurred, adding that implanting human organoids into mice provides an especially useful model.
Another audience member asked about the potential for human stem cell therapy in the brain. Hogan pointed to the use of fetal cells for treating Parkinsons disease as an example, but panelist Hans Schler suggested that that could be a unique case. Patients with Parkinsons disease suffer from deficiency in dopamine-secreting neurons, so implanting cells that secrete dopamine in the correct brain region may provide some relief.
Panelists also addressed the use of stem cells in regenerative medicine, where researchers are targeting the nexus of aging, nutrition, and brain health. Emmanuelle Passegu explained that the bodys progressive failure to regenerate itself from its own stem cells is a hallmark of aging. I think we are getting to an era where transplantation or engraftment [of cells] will not be the answer, it will really be trying to reawaken the normal properties of the [patients own] stem cells, said Passegu.
As the meeting concluded, speakers and attendees seemed to agree that the field of stem cell research, like the cells themselves, is now poised to develop in a wide range of promising directions.
View original post here:
The New Transformers: Innovators in Regenerative Medicine - NYAS - The New York Academy of Sciences
Science Milestone: The evolution of gene therapy – Drug Discovery News
The concept of putting genes into the human body to correct a missing or dysfunctional gene first emerged in the 1960s. Since then, the field of gene therapy has experienced groundbreaking research discoveries, tragic pitfalls, and finally, a resurgence in interest and a rise in breakthroughs.
Download this Science Milestone from Drug Discovery News to learn about the complicated past of early gene therapy discoveries and the technologies that eventually led to gene therapy success.
Original post:
Science Milestone: The evolution of gene therapy - Drug Discovery News
Hereditary Alzheimer’s Transmitted Via Bone Marrow Transplants – Neuroscience News
Summary: Alzheimers disease, traditionally seen as a brain-centric condition, may have systemic origins and can be accelerated through bone marrow transplants from donors with familial Alzheimers to healthy mice.
A new study underscores the diseases potential transmission via cellular therapies and suggests screening donors for Alzheimers markers to prevent inadvertent disease transfer.
By demonstrating that amyloid proteins from peripheral sources can induce Alzheimers in the central nervous system, this research shifts the understanding of Alzheimers towards a more systemic perspective, highlighting the need for cautious screening in transplants and blood transfusions.
Key Facts:
Source: Cell Press
Familial Alzheimers disease can be transferred via bone marrow transplant, researchers show March 28 in the journalStem Cell Reports. When the team transplanted bone marrow stem cells from mice carrying a hereditary version of Alzheimers disease into normal lab mice, the recipients developed Alzheimers diseaseand at an accelerated rate.
The study highlights the role of amyloid that originates outside of the brain in the development of Alzheimers disease, which changes the paradigm of Alzheimers from being a disease that is exclusively produced in the brain to a more systemic disease.
Based on their findings, the researchers say that donors of blood, tissue, organ, and stem cells should be screened for Alzheimers disease to prevent its inadvertent transfer during blood product transfusions and cellular therapies.
This supports the idea that Alzheimers is a systemic disease where amyloids that are expressed outside of the brain contribute to central nervous system pathology, says senior author and immunologist Wilfred Jefferies, of the University of British Columbia.
As we continue to explore this mechanism, Alzheimers disease may be the tip of the iceberg and we need to have far better controls and screening of the donors used in blood, organ and tissue transplants as well as in the transfers of human derived stem cells or blood products.
To test whether a peripheral source of amyloid could contribute to the development of Alzheimers in the brain, the researchers transplanted bone marrow containing stem cells from mice carrying a familial version of the diseasea variant of the human amyloid precursor protein (APP) gene, which, when cleaved, misfolded and aggregated, forms the amyloid plaques that are a hallmark of Alzheimers disease.
They performed transplants into two different strains of recipient mice: APP-knockout mice that lacked an APP gene altogether, and mice that carried a normal APP gene.
In this model of heritable Alzheimers disease, mice usually begin developing plaques at 9 to 10 months of age, and behavioral signs of cognitive decline begin to appear at 11 to 12 months of age. Surprisingly, the transplant recipients began showing symptoms of cognitive decline much earlierat 6 months post-transplant for the APP-knockout mice and at 9 months for the normal mice.
The fact that we could see significant behavioral differences and cognitive decline in the APP-knockouts at 6 months was surprising but also intriguing because it just showed the appearance of the disease that was being accelerated after being transferred, says first author Chaahat Singh of the University of British Columbia.
In mice, signs of cognitive decline present as an absence of normal fear and a loss of short and long-term memory. Both groups of recipient mice also showed clear molecular and cellular hallmarks of Alzheimers disease, including leaky blood-brain barriers and buildup of amyloid in the brain.
Observing the transfer of disease in APP-knockout mice that lacked an APP gene altogether, the team concluded that the mutated gene in the donor cells can cause the disease and observing that recipient animals that carried a normal APP gene are susceptible to the disease suggests that the disease can be transferred to health individuals.
Because the transplanted stem cells were hematopoietic cells, meaning that they could develop into blood and immune cells but not neurons, the researchers demonstration of amyloid in the brains of APP knockout mice shows definitively that Alzheimers disease can result from amyloid that is produced outside of the central nervous system.
Finally the source of the disease in mice is a human APP gene demonstrating the mutated human gene can transfer the disease in a different species.
In future studies, the researchers plan to test whether transplanting tissues from normal mice to mice with familial Alzheimers could mitigate the disease and to test whether the disease is also transferable via other types of transplants or transfusions and to expand the investigation of the transfer of disease between species.
In this study, we examined bone marrow and stem cells transplantation. However, next it will be important to examine if inadvertent transmission of disease takes place during the application of other forms of cellular therapies, as well as to directly examine the transfer of disease from contaminated sources, independent from cellular mechanisms, says Jefferies.
Funding:
This research was supported by the Canadian Institutes of Health Research, the W. Garfield Weston Foundation/Weston Brain Institute, the Centre for Blood Research, the University of British Columbia, the Austrian Academy of Science, and the Sullivan Urology Foundation at Vancouver General Hospital.
Author: Kristopher Benke Source: Cell Reports Contact: Kristopher Benke Cell Reports Image: The image is credited to Neuroscience News
Original Research: The findings will appear in Stem Cell Reports
More here:
Hereditary Alzheimer's Transmitted Via Bone Marrow Transplants - Neuroscience News
New immunotherapy could make blood more ‘youthful,’ mouse study hints – Livescience.com
Scientists reversed some signs of immune aging in mice with a new treatment that could one day potentially be used in humans.
The new immunotherapy works by disrupting a natural process by which the immune system becomes biased towards making one type of cell as it ages.
The mouse study is an "important" proof-of-concept, but it's currently difficult to gauge the significance of the findings, Dr. Janko . Nikolich-Zugich, a professor of immunobiology at the University of Arizona who was not involved in the research, told Live Science in an email. More work is needed to see how well the therapy shifts the immune system into a more youthful, effective state.
All blood cells, including immune cells and the red blood cells that carry oxygen around the body, start life as hematopoietic stem cells (HSC) in the blood and bone marrow, the spongy tissue found within certain bones. HSCs fall into two main categories: those destined to become so-called myeloid cells and those that will develop into lymphoid cells.
Myeloid cells include red blood cells and immune cells belonging to our broadly reactive first line of defense against pathogens, including cells called macrophages that trigger inflammation. Lymphoid cells include cells that develop a memory of germs, such as T and B cells.
Related: 'If you don't have inflammation, then you'll die': How scientists are reprogramming the body's natural superpower
As we age, the HSCs slated to become myeloid cells gradually increase in number and eventually outnumber the lymphoid stem cells. This means we can't respond to infections as well when we're older as when we're young, and we're more likely to experience chronic inflammation triggered by increasing levels of myeloid cells that trigger inflammation.
Get the worlds most fascinating discoveries delivered straight to your inbox.
In the new study, published Wednesday (March 27) in the journal Nature, scientists developed an antibody-based therapy that selectively targets and destroys the myeloid HSCs, thus restoring the balance of the two cell types and making the blood more "youthful." The antibodies latch onto the targeted cells and flag them to be destroyed by the immune system.
The authors injected the therapy into mice aged 18 to 24 months, or roughly the equivalent of being between 56 and 69 years old as a human.
They then extracted HSCs from the mice after treatment and analyzed them, revealing the rodents had a smaller percentage of the myeloid HSCs than untreated mice of the same age.
This effect lasted for two months. Compared with untreated mice, the treated mice also produced more naive T cells and mature B cells. These cells can go on to form memory cells, which are directly involved in the immune attack; in the case of the B cells, they can form antibody-producing plasma cells.
"Not only did we see a shift toward cells involved in adaptive immunity, but we also observed a dampening in the levels of inflammatory proteins in the treated animals," Dr. Jason Ross, lead study author and postdoctoral researcher at Stanford University, said in a statement. Specifically, the researchers saw that the levels of one proinflammatory protein fell in the treated mice. This protein, called IL-1beta, is mainly made by myeloid cells.
Eight weeks post-treatment, the researchers vaccinated the mice against a virus they'd never been exposed to before. The mice that had received the immunotherapy had more apt immune responses to vaccination than the untreated mice, producing more T cells against the germ.
"We believe that this study represents the first steps in applying this strategy in humans," Ross said. However, other experts have cautioned against jumping to conclusions.
Nikolich-Zugich noted that, although the researchers measured changes in the numbers of naive T cells in the mice, they didn't look at the function of the organ that makes them: the thymus. The team also saw reductions only in IL-1beta and not other inflammatory proteins. They also didn't test whether the mice's baseline immunity to new infections could be improved with this therapy, without vaccination, he said.
Furthermore, the study didn't consider potential long-term side effects of the treatment, such as anemia, or a deficiency in red blood cells, said Dr. Ilaria Bellantuono, a professor in musculoskeletal aging at the University of Sheffield in the U.K. who was not involved in the research.
Although an "interesting" study, more work is needed to understand whether it can bring "meaningful changes" in the immune system, Bellantuono told Live Science in an email, whether that of mice or humans.
Ever wonder why some people build muscle more easily than others or why freckles come out in the sun? Send us your questions about how the human body works to community@livescience.com with the subject line "Health Desk Q," and you may see your question answered on the website!
Here is the original post:
New immunotherapy could make blood more 'youthful,' mouse study hints - Livescience.com
Exosomes and Stem Cells Are the Future of Anti-Aging – NewBeauty Magazine
Our skin is a story, told chapter by chapter as we age. But what if we could rewrite it? That seemingly sci-fi future is already here thanks to cutting-edge technologies like exosomes, stem cells and bio-identical hormones. Changing the approach from preservation to regeneration, these new treatments and technologies are changing the narrative around aging.
Thats how New York dermatologistJulie Russak, MDdescribes the shift in her practice since employing these tools. The aging process leaves its mark on our skin, but advancements in regenerative medicine are rewriting the narrative, she says. Exosomes and stem cells, previously confined to the realm of science fiction, are now emerging as powerful tools in my dermatology arsenal.
The next big thing in dermatology, the exosome, is essentially a delivery system. Imagine microscopic envelopes meticulously created by stem cells, packed with genetic
instructions and protein packages, Dr. Russak explains. These are exosomes.
Just like envelopes, whats contained inside is whats really interesting.
Exosomes deliver key signaling molecules, instructing fibroblasts, or skin cells, to ramp up collagen production, Dr. Russak says. This translates to thicker, firmer skin with visibly reduced wrinkles and fine lines.
They offer an answer to sun damage as well.
Sun damage wreaks havoc on our skin, but exosomes offer a cellular-level repair kit, Dr. Russak explains. They promote the regeneration of UV-damaged structures, mitigating the appearance of sunspots and uneven tone. Unlike broad-spectrum approaches, exosomes excel at precision. They hone in on specific skin cells, ensuring their restorative cargo reaches the areas that need it most, maximizing effectiveness and minimizing potential side effects.
Stem cells are the master cells of regeneration, says Dr. Russak. These unique cells possess the remarkable ability to self-renew and differentiate into various specialized cell types, including those crucial for healthy skin.
In dermatology, stem cells are utilized to regenerate tissue and promote collagen production, which makes them perfect for tackling things like age spots, skin firmness and even hair loss. Theyre also employed during in-office treatments like microneedling and laser treatments to expedite recovery and maximize rejuvenation. Because they can be directed to become different kinds of skin cells, stem cells are especially versatile to dermatologists.
We use this versatility in dermatological treatments to replace damaged or aging cells with new, healthy cells, Dr. Russak explains. Both exosomes and stem cell treatments represent a shift towards a more regenerative and holistic approach in dermatology. Rather than merely masking the symptoms of aging skin, these treatments aim to restore the skins natural ability to heal and renew itself.
In the world of anti-aging, the name Dr. David Sinclair is a big one. Australian-American biologist and professor of genetics at Harvard Medical School, Dr. Sinclair has published pivotal work on the science of aging and longevity.
These innovative methods are partly inspired by groundbreaking research in cellular health and aging, including the work of Dr. David Sinclair, Dr. Russak explains. In the field of dermatology, theres a growing trend toward using regenerative medicine to slow aging, with a focus on treatments like exosomes, stem cell therapies and bio-identical hormone replacement therapy (BHRT).
Using exosomes in procedures like microneedling is just the beginning.
We are incorporating topical treatments with peptides and growth factors, as well as injectable therapies like PRP (Platelet-Rich Plasma) and biostimultary molecules like PLLC and CaHa to stimulate the skins natural repair processes, Dr. Russak explains.
Alongside things like diet, lifestyle change and nutraceuticals like NAD+ boosters, dermatologists aim to improve skin, slow down aging and potentially even reverse hair loss.
Unlike many traditional methods of anti-aging, exosomes and stem cells are a natural path to rejuvenation. Rather than masking signs of damage, these treatments are encouraging your body to do the work itself.
Its important to have realistic expectations and understand that multiple treatments may be necessary, Dr. Russak says. Rigorous clinical research is ongoing and long-term data is still needed to definitively establish the safety and efficacy of these treatments. While the future holds immense promise, I remain grounded in evidence-based practice, incorporating these innovations only when robust scientific data supports their benefit.
Due to the newness of these treatments, more long-term studies are needed to fully understand their safety and efficacy. Because the regulatory side of things havent caught up to the technology, practitioners also must consider how to ethically source stem cells and exosomes.
Patients should ensure treatments are performed by qualified professionals and that the products used are compliant with regulatory standards, Dr. Russak explains. As we are just at the very beginning of this exciting field, practitioners and patients need to exercise due diligence when considering these treatments.
Read the rest here:
Exosomes and Stem Cells Are the Future of Anti-Aging - NewBeauty Magazine
The First Cryonic Preservation Took Place Fifty Years Ago Today
The cryonics industry and those who support cryonics refer to those who undergo the procedure after death as "cryonauts." ValentynVolkov /iStockPhoto
To some, its the possibility of another life for themselves or a loved one. To others, its science fiction.
Whatever it is, cryonicsdefined by the Alcor Life Extension Foundation as the science of using ultra-cold temperatures to preserve human life with the intent of restoring good health when technology becomes available to do so has now been around for 60 years, since the death of retired psychology professor James H. Bedford. Alcor, the company that still has his body in a frozen chamber, calls him the first cryonaut. (Cryonics is sometimes incorrectly referred to as cryogenics.)
Bedford was frozen long before Alcor was formed in 1976, but today thats where he rests with 148 others, in the Patient Care Bay in Scottsdale, Arizona. After his death, aged 73, of kidney cancer, his body was put on ice, The New York Times Magazine wrote in 1997. Then his body was processed by experts from the Cryonics Society of California, the Times wrote.
Sam Shaw of This American Life got a little more detail on what happened when the first cryonaut was frozen. He interviewed Bob Nelson, a TV repairman who became president of the society, a nonprofit consisting mostly of people who wanted to be cryonically preserved. What he discovered: like Nelson, most of the societys members were amateurs, and the scientists they had persuaded to work on the theoretical question of cryonics were skeptical. They wanted to take things slow, conduct research, publish papers, Shaw says. Then James Beford asked to be frozen, and they decided to go for it in spite of the fact that theyd lose the scientific communitys support.
When Dr. Bedford died on January 12, 1967, they were all caught off guard. Dr. Bedfords nurse had to run up and down the block collecting ice from the home freezers of neighbours. Cryonics was still just a theory, and the proceedings had the slightly manic quality of a local theater production, forced to open a couple of weeks early.
Bedford has been frozen ever since, although both his container and the place where he rests have changed. After his body was preserved, Alcor writes, he was handed over to family. His very devoted son stored him at a succession of locations over some two decades before transferring both his care and custody to Alcor, the foundation writes. According to the Times, his body was kept at a warehouse in Anaheim, a cryonics facility in Emeryville, somewhere else undisclosed and Fullerton before coming to Alcor. The reason for so many moves: fifty years ago, there was no cryonics industry and it was a fringe idea at best.
Around Bedfords body, the landscape of cryonics has also transformed dramatically, but despite Alcors strict protocols, theres no proof that its method of cryopreservation is actually working, writes George Dvorsky for Gizmodo. For all we know, every single person at the facility is a goner. Cryonics is still only the hope of a future for those preserved, even, as Dvorsky writes, when theyre terminally ill children.
If Bedford is ever re-animated, he will be in some strange company, writes Stacy Conradt for Mental Floss: mathematician Thomas K. Donaldson, a man who changed his name to FM-2030, Alcor vice president Jerry Leaf and both baseball player Ted Williams and his son John-Henry Williams are on ice at Alcor.
Get the latest stories in your inbox every weekday.
Excerpt from:
The First Cryonic Preservation Took Place Fifty Years Ago Today