Posts Tagged ‘best’
Report Cites ‘Misinformation,’ ‘Remarkably Weak’ Evidence to Support Use of Puberty Blockers and Cross-Sex … – CatholicVote org
A long-awaited final report on the state of treatment for gender dysphoria in children and teens under the care of Englands National Health Service (NHS) has revealed the current clinical approach utilizing puberty blockers and cross-sex hormones is based on remarkably weak evidence stemming from poor quality of the published studies, and misinformation while exhibiting expectations of care that are far from usual clinical practice.
In the foreword to the report, British pediatrician Dr. Hilary Cass, who led an independent review team from the University of York, wrote that while the medical field is usually cautious in recommending new treatments for children and teens, quite the reverse happened in the field of gender care for children:
This is an area of remarkably weak evidence, and yet results of studies are exaggerated or misrepresented by people on all sides of the debate to support their viewpoint. The reality is that we have no good evidence on the long-term outcomes of interventions to manage gender-related distress.
[T]he toxicity of the debate is exceptional, Cass said about the issue of medical gender treatments for children. The knowledge and expertise of experienced clinicians who have reached different conclusions about the best approach to care are sometimes dismissed and invalidated.
The reports summary clearly asserts that, while some think the clinical approach should be based on a social justice model, the NHS works in an evidence-based way.
Our current understanding of the long-term health impacts of hormone interventions is limited, the review notes as it also acknowledges the rapid surge in referrals for such medical treatment.
The numbers of children and young people presenting to the UK NHS Gender Identity Service (GIDS) has been increasing year on year since 2009, with an exponential rise in 2014, the report observes, noting the use of puberty blockers began following the emergence of the Dutch Protocol.
The review team stressed the rapid push to utilize puberty blockers, despite any evidence showing effectiveness:
Preliminary results from the early intervention study in 2015-2016 did not demonstrate benefit. The results of the study were not formally published until 2020, at which time it showed there was a lack of any positive measurable outcomes. Despite this, from 2014 puberty blockers moved from a research-only protocol to being available in routine clinical practice and were given to a broader group of patients who would not have met the inclusion criteria of the original protocol.
The systematic review by the University of York found multiple studies that show puberty blockers not only suppress puberty, but also compromise bone density.
Yet, evidence regarding the use of puberty blockers and cross-sex hormones to treat gender dysphoria had already been shown to be weak, with a lot of misinformation easily accessible online and remaining currently, the review stated.
The World Professional Association of Transgender Healthcare (WPATH) has been highly influential in directing international practice, although its guidelines were found by the University of York appraisal process to lack developmental rigour, the report asserts.
In March, leaked internal files from WPATH, often touted by Dr. Rachel (born Richard) Levine, a top Biden HHS official, as the premier organization for evidence-based treatment recommendations, revealed its doctors acknowledging children and teens were not capable of comprehending the possible long-term effects of the treatments and surgeries they were prescribed.
The review team notes that while research suggests gender expression is influenced by biological predisposition, early childhood experiences, sexuality and expectations of puberty, and, therefore, requires a multi-disciplinary team approach to assessing the problem areas for each individual child, the most striking problem is the lack of any consensus on the purpose of the assessment process.
Some service users and advocates view an extensive exploration of other conditions and diagnoses as an attempt to find any other reason for the persons distress other than them being trans, the team observes.
While the report states there are some young people for whom medical treatment for gender dysphoria will be the best outcome, it notes as well young adults looking back at their younger selves would often advise slowing down as they and their parents weigh the ramifications.
Some may transition and then de/retransition and/or experience regret, the review acknowledges, concluding a medical pathway is not the best treatment protocol for the majority of young people:
[T]he focus on the use of puberty blockers for managing gender-related distress has overshadowed the possibility that other evidence-based treatments may be more effective. The intent of psychosocial intervention is not to change the persons perception of who they are, but to work with them to explore their concerns and experiences and help alleviate their distress regardless of whether or not the young person subsequently proceeds on a medical pathway.
[N]o changes in gender dysphoria or body satisfaction were demonstrated as a result of puberty blockers, the report plainly asserts.
The review team also addressed the controversy over social transition what has become known as the initial phase of so-called gender-affirming care.
The systematic review showed no clear evidence that social transition in childhood has any positive or negative mental health outcomes, and relatively weak evidence for any effect in adolescence, the report concludes. However, those who had socially transitioned at an earlier age and/or prior to being seen in clinic were more likely to proceed to a medical pathway.
Reviewers similarly found no support for the claim by transgender activists that administering puberty blockers allows time for children and their families to consider further medical intervention:
[G]iven that the vast majority of young people started on puberty blockers proceed from puberty blockers to masculinising/ feminising hormones, there is no evidence that puberty blockers buy time to think, and some concern that they may change the trajectory of psychosexual and gender identity development.
There is a lack of high-quality research assessing the outcomes of hormone interventions in adolescents with gender dysphoria/incongruence, and few studies that undertake long-term follow-up, the review team explains.
In addition, reviewers found no evidence to support the transition or die claim that hormone treatment prevents a high risk of suicide in minors with gender dysphoria.
>> FINNISH STUDY: GENDER-AFFIRMING CARE DOES NOT REDUCE YOUTH SUICIDE <<
The primary predictor of death in gender-dysphoric young people is psychiatric morbidity, the researchers said. Medical gender reassignment does not have an impact on suicide risk.
The current evidence base suggests that children who present with gender incongruence at a young age are most likely to desist before puberty, although for a small number the incongruence will persist, the Cass report concludes.
This final report stresses the need for a holistic assessment of children and teens referred for gender services:
This should include screening for neurodevelopmental conditions, including autism spectrum disorder, and a mental health assessment.
Standard evidence based psychological and psychopharmacological treatment approaches should be used to support the management of the associated distress and cooccurring conditions, the team recommends. This should include support for parents/carers and siblings as appropriate.
The release of the Cass report comes only days after Dignitas Infinita on Human Dignity, the most recent document from the Dicastery for the Doctrine of the Faith (DDF), was issued.
The DDF declaration addresses human dignity and reaffirms traditional teachings of the Church, including those on gender ideology and sex-change surgery.
>> READ CVS ANALYSIS OF DIGNITAS INFINITA HERE <<
History Timeline – The Cryonics Institute
1976 ROBERT ETTINGER FOUNDS THE CRYONICS INSTITUTE
Then in 1976 a separate organization was formed: the Cryonics Institute, to offer cryostasis services: careful preparation, cooling, and long term patient care in liquid nitrogen.
Our goal was maximum reliability and affordability. And we achieved it. The Cryonics Institute offers clear-cut advantages over all other providers. Such as:
Our prices are lower than any other organization in fact, the most affordable prices anywhere in the world. Our minimum whole-body suspension fee is $28,000. (For members at a distance, transportation costs and local help will be additional.) Our $28,000 fee is a one-time only payment, with no subsequent charges. Its easily funded by insurance or other means, and funds the best care available for our member patients. (For last-minute cases, where the patient was not signed up beforehand, we ordinarily charge $35,000 rather than $28,000, if arrangements can be worked out at all.)
Does that lower fee mean lower quality patient care or services? No. The major part of other organizations fees are earmarked for investment provisions totally unrelated to patient care and preparation. Methods and research differ, but overall we believe our procedures and policies give a better chance for patient survival than any other organizations and this web site will show you the detailed reasons why.
See for yourself. Read our FAQ and see The CI Advantage that compares the different cryonics organizations and why we think CI gives you and those you love the best possible chance for future survival. Remember: most CI members can afford the higher prices of other organizations for themselves and their families and often do give more, in bequests and donations. But weve chosen CI because we know its our best bet. And yours.
We have a unique, proven track record of financial security and stability. Price stability too. CI is the only organization with no debt, no stockholders, and no landlords. We own our patient care facilities outright, and all our officers and directors donate their services voluntarily. Were one of the oldest cryonics organizations in existence and the only such organization that has never raised its prices, even in high-inflation times like the late 70s and early 80s. Adjusting for inflation, our prices have actually steadily declined, and we expect this to continue.
Financially, we are the soundest cryonics organization in existence.
We have a uniquely flexible and rapid system of emergency patient care based on universally available networks of mortuary assistance (and often medical assistance). This means that in the critical early stages, we can bring qualified professionals to you faster than any other system to you, and to travelers, vacationers, and members throughout most of the world. In particular, London-based F.A. Albin & Sons funeral directors are trained, practiced, equipped, and prepared to fly a team anywhere in Europe on short notice to help European CI members or tourists and business travelers.
And finally, we provide a comprehensive source of information here on CIs website. The site youre reading will lead you to everything you need to know about the subject of cryonics, and more. It offers you free information, free books, the latest news, hundreds of links to thousands of sources covering health, science, cutting-edge medicine, nanotechnology, financial help and resources, and supportive people and organizations. And if thats not enough? We personally will answer any question you might have about cryonics or the Cryonics Institute directly by email, or direct you to someone who can. In the world of cryonics, this is the source to visit, and the place to be.